Contained in:
Book Chapter

Introduction. An Archaeology of Modernism

  • Maite Méndez Baiges

The book meticulously analyses the history of the critical reception of avantguard art through the interpretations received by one of its greatest emblems, Les Demoiselles d'Avignon by Picasso, 1907. Since Les Demoiselles has been considered over this century the true paradigm of Modern Art, this book is, fundamentally, a sort of synthesis of the discourses about Modernism from formalism, iconology, Leo Steinberg's 'Other Criteria’, sociological, the biographical and psychoanalytical theses, cultural and historicist and lastly, the impact of post-structuralism and the feminist, post-colonialist and transnational interpretations. The final chapter deals with the artistic versions of Les Demoiselles d'Avignon made by artists. It is an essay on the different versions and identities of Modern Art and Modernism that have been produced throughout the last century.

  • Keywords:
  • Modernism,
  • Demoiselles d'Avignon,
  • Modernist Criticism,
  • New History of Art,
  • Global History of Art,
+ Show More

Maite Méndez Baiges

University of Malaga, Spain - ORCID: 0000-0002-0762-7004

  1. Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. The Social Life of Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Bal, Mieke. 1999. Quoting Caravaggio: Contemporary Art. Chicago: Preposterous History and Chicago University Press.
  3. Chamananda Ngozi, Adichie. 2018. “El silencio es un lujo que no podemos permitirnos.” El País. 27 October, 2018.
  4. Débray, Regis. 1994. Vida y muerte de la imagen. Historia de la mirada en Occidente. Translated by Ramón Hervás. Barcelona: Paidós.
  5. D’Souza, Aruna. 2002. “Biography becomes Form: William Rubin, Pablo Picasso and the Subject of Art History.” Word & Image, 18, no. 2 (April-June): 126–36. DOI: 10.1080/02666286.2002.10404983
  6. Golding, John. 2001. “Les Demoiselles d’Avignon and the Exhibition of 1988.” In Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon, edited by Christopher Green, 15–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Harris, Jonathan. 2001. The New Art History. A Critical Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.
  8. Irigaray, Luce. 1978. “Un art différent de sentir, interview to Luce Irigaray”. In Les femmes, la pornographie, l’erotisme, edited by Marie Françoise Hans and Gilles Lapouge, 43–58. Seuil: Paris.
  9. Joyeux Prunel, Béatrice. 2015. Les avant-gardes artistiques. 1848-1918. Une histoire transnationale. Paris: Gallimard.
  10. Owens, Craig. 1983. The Discourse of Others: Feminists and Postmodernism. In The Anti-Aesthetic. Essays on Postmodern Culture, edited by Hal Foster, 57-82. Seattle: Bay Press.
  11. Rubin, William, et al. 1994. “Les Demoiselles d’Avignon.” Studies in Modern Art 3: New York: Museum of Modern Art.
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2022
  • Pages: 11-22
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2022 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2022
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2022 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Introduction. An Archaeology of Modernism

Authors

Maite Méndez Baiges

Language

English

DOI

10.36253/978-88-5518-656-8.02

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2022

Copyright Information

© 2022 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

Les Demoiselles d’Avignon and Modernism

Authors

Maite Méndez Baiges

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

148

Publication Year

2022

Copyright Information

© 2022 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/978-88-5518-656-8

ISBN Print

978-88-5518-655-1

eISBN (pdf)

978-88-5518-656-8

eISBN (epub)

978-88-5518-657-5

Series Title

Studi e saggi

Series ISSN

2704-6478

Series E-ISSN

2704-5919

111

Fulltext
downloads

76

Views

Export Citation

1,293

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

1,734

Book Chapters

3,046,783

Fulltext
downloads

3,959

Authors

from 814 Research Institutions

of 63 Nations

60

scientific boards

from 327 Research Institutions

of 41 Nations

1,138

Referees

from 343 Research Institutions

of 36 Nations