Contained in:
Book Chapter

After Picasso: Reinterpretations and recreations of Les Demoiselles D’Avignon in Contemporary Art

  • Maite Méndez Baiges

Another way of showing interpretations of Picasso's Demoiselles is to heed the replicas, copies, pictorial or artistic versions made by contemporary artists. This chapter presents the artistic versions of the work done by artists at the end of the 20th and start of the 21st century. It begins the pop replicas by Caulfield or Equipo Crónico and the appropriationists like Richard Prince or Mark Bidlo. And continuing with those done by feminist or Afroamerican artists like Faith Ringgold or the queer versions of Rafael Agredano. Finally it deals with the geographical and culturally situated critical proposals of Francis Alÿs or Rogelio López Cuenca/Elo Vega.

  • Keywords:
  • Demoiselles d'Avignon,
  • Postcolonialism,
  • Feminism,
+ Show More

Maite Méndez Baiges

University of Malaga, Spain - ORCID: 0000-0002-0762-7004

  1. Barthes, Roland. 1984. “La mort de l’auteur.” In Le bruissement de la langue, 61–7. Paris: Seuil.
  2. Cameron, Dan, ed. 1988. Dancing at the Louvre. Faith Ringgold’s French Collection and Other Story Quilts. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  3. Chave, Anna C. 1994. “New Encounters with Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. Gender, Race, and the Origins of Cubism.” Art Bulletin 76, no. 4 (December): 597–611.
  4. Didi-Huberman, Georges. 2000. Devant le temps: histoire de l’art et anchronisme des images. Paris: Les Éditions du Minuit
  5. Dupuis-Labbé, Dominique. 2007. Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. Paris: Bartillat.
  6. Fitzgerald, Sharon. 1997. “Robert Colescott Rocks the Boat: Painter’s Work Shown at June 1997 International Festival.” American Visions, 12, no. 3 (June-July): 14–9.
  7. Foucault, Michel. 1971. L’Ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.
  8. Gersh-Nesic, Beth S. 2007. The Demoiselles Revisited. New York: Francis N. Nauman.
  9. Godefroy, Cécile. 2015. “Picasso et la tapisserie.” http://revoirpicasso.fr/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/RevoirPicasso-2015_J1_M.Godefroy.pdf (2021-03-28).
  10. Krauss, Rosalind. 1981. “In the Name of Picasso.” October 16, no. 102 (Spring): 5–22. DOI: 10.2307/778371
  11. Graulic, Melody, and Mara Witzling. 2001. “The Freedom to Say what She Pleases: A Conversation with Faith Ringgold.” In Black Feminist Cultural Criticism, edited by Jacqueline Bobo, 184–209. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.
  12. Lebrero Stals, José. 2012. Prince/Picasso. Málaga: Museo Picasso Málaga.
  13. Ottinger, Didier, ed. 2015. Picasso. Mania. Paris: Éditions de la Réunion des musées nationaux-Grand Palais.
  14. Rosenblum, Robert. 1973. “The Demoiselles Revisited.” Art News 72, no. 4 (April): 45–8.
  15. Steinberg, Leo. 1988. “The Philosophical Brothel.” October no. 44 (Spring): 7–74.
  16. Vega, Elo. “Surviving October”. <http://elovega.net/surviving-october/> Accessed April 4, 2021.
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2022
  • Pages: 103-123
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2022 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2022
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2022 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

After Picasso: Reinterpretations and recreations of Les Demoiselles D’Avignon in Contemporary Art

Authors

Maite Méndez Baiges

Language

English

DOI

10.36253/978-88-5518-656-8.08

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2022

Copyright Information

© 2022 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

Les Demoiselles d’Avignon and Modernism

Authors

Maite Méndez Baiges

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

148

Publication Year

2022

Copyright Information

© 2022 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/978-88-5518-656-8

ISBN Print

978-88-5518-655-1

eISBN (pdf)

978-88-5518-656-8

eISBN (epub)

978-88-5518-657-5

Series Title

Studi e saggi

Series ISSN

2704-6478

Series E-ISSN

2704-5919

461

Fulltext
downloads

135

Views

Export Citation

1,308

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

1,962

Book Chapters

3,290,448

Fulltext
downloads

4,155

Authors

from 869 Research Institutions

of 64 Nations

63

scientific boards

from 340 Research Institutions

of 43 Nations

1,150

Referees

from 345 Research Institutions

of 37 Nations