Contained in:
Book Chapter

“Contributions to a Kantology”. Schleiermacher’s Critical Assessment of Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View

  • Riccardo Martinelli

The paper examines Friedrich Schleiermacher’s 1799 review of Immanuel Kant’s Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Schleiermacher’s critique, published anonymously in the Athenaeum, adopts a harsh and ironic tone, deeming Kant’s work as trivial and flawed. Schleiermacher argues that Kant’s attempt to reconcile systematic and popular elements within his anthropology led to its failure, coining the term “Kantology” to refer to a superficial study of Kant’s personality rather than a substantive contribution to anthropology. Schleiermacher contends that Kant’s anthropology is internally inconsistent and overly reliant on a rigid distinction between physiological and pragmatic anthropology. According to Schleiermacher, this distinction oversimplifies human nature by neglecting the necessary unity between bodily and mental aspects. The paper highlights how Schleiermacher’s review is an important critique of Kant’s Anthropology, providing insights into both Kant’s and Schleiermacher’s philosophical views. Schleiermacher criticizes Kant’s approach as falling into “lower realism,” missing the transcendental and “higher realism” that he associates with religion and human freedom. Despite its acerbic tone, the review is seen as a valuable contribution to the study of Kant’s anthropology and Schleiermacher’s philosophical development. Schleiermacher’s review raises fundamental questions about the compatibility of Kant’s anthropology with his broader critical philosophy and offers a re-evaluation of how Kant’s ideas on human nature, freedom, and history are integrated into his system of thought.

  • Keywords:
  • Kant,
  • Schleiermacher,
  • Review,
  • Anthropology,
  • Realism,
+ Show More

Riccardo Martinelli

University of Trieste, Italy - ORCID: 0009-0004-0133-7227

  1. RPA = [Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel]. 2008. “Schleiermacher’s Review of Immanuel Kants‘ Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View.” [1799]. In Schleiermacher on Workings of the Knowing Mind: New Translations, Resources, and Understandings, ed. by Ruth Drucilla Richardson: 15-19. Lewiston (NY): Mellen.
  2. PA = Kant, Immanuel. 2007. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. In Anthropology, History and Education. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation, vol. 7: 227-429. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  3. Arndt, Andreas. 2013. Friedrich Schleiermacher als Philosoph. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
  4. Auerochs, Bernd. 2017. “Manuskripte - Athenaeum - Geselliges Betragen - Vertraute Briefe.” In Schleiermacher Handbuch, ed. by Martin Ohst: 87-102. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
  5. Bauer, Manuel. 2019. Schlegel und Schleiermacher. Frühromantische Kunstkritik und Hermeneutik. Schöning: Brill.
  6. Blackwell, Albert L. 1982. Schleiermacher’s Early Philosophy of Life. Determinism, Freedom, and Phantasy. Harvard Theological Studies. Chico (CA): Scholar Press.
  7. Brino, Omar. 2011. “La tematica del corpo nelle psicologie filosofiche ‘realistiche’ del primo Ottocento tedesco: Herbart, Fries, Schleiermacher.” Etica & Politica 13.2: 111-138.
  8. Bondì, Davide. 2017. “Sulla Libertà. L’abbrivio di Schleiermacher tra Kant e gli illuministi.” Rivista di storia della filosofia 2: 209-244.
  9. Cohen, Alix. 2008a. “The Ultimate Kantian Experience: Kant on Dinner Parties.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 25.4: 315-336.
  10. Cohen, Alix. 2008b. “Physiological vs. Pragmatic Anthropology: A Response to Schleiermacher’s Objection to Kant’s Anthropology.” In Recht und Frieden. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, ed by Valério Rohden, vol. 5: 3-14. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
  11. Crouter, Robert. 2005. Friedrich Schleiermacher. Between Enlightenment and Romanticism. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1969. Brief an E. Adickes [10.1.1905]. In Id., Beiträge zur Geschichte und Interpretation der Philosophie Kants, ed. by G. Lehmann: 12-26. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
  13. Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1970. Leben Schleiermachers. Erster Band., ed. by Martin Redeker. In Gesammelte Schriften Wilhelm Diltheys, vol. 13. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  14. Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1996. Leben Schleiermachers. Zweiter Band, ed. by Martin Redeker. In Gesammelte Schriften Wilhelm Diltheys, vol. 14.1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  15. Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1989. Introduction to the Human Sciences. Ed. by R.A. Makkrreel and F. Rodi. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  16. Frank, Manfred. 2005. “Metaphysical Foundations: a Look at Schleiermacher‘s Dialectic.” In The Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher, ed. by Jacqueline Mariña, 11-34. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Frierson, Patrick. 2003. Freedom and Anthropology in Kant‘s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Giacca, Emanuela. 2014. “La formazione del pensiero etico di Schleiermacher.” Archivio di filosofia 82.3: 13-261.
  19. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. 1890. “Brief an F. Schiller.” [19.12.1798]. In Briefwechsel zwischen Schiller und Goethe in den Jahren 1794 bis 1805 (vol. 2, 1798-1805): 145-146. Stuttgart/Berlin/Leipzig: Union.
  20. Haym, Rudolf. 1870. Die romantische Schule. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des deutschen Geistes. Berlin: Gaertner.
  21. Herms, Eilert. 2017. “Leibhafter Geist - Beseelte Organisation. - Schleiermachers Psychologie als Anthropologie. Ihre Stellung in seinem theologisch-philosophischen System und ihre Gegenwartsbedeutung.” In Der Mensch und seine Seele. Bildung - Frömmigkeit - Ästhetik. Akten des Internationalen Kongresses der Schleiermacher-Gesellschaft in Münster, September 2015, ed. by Arnulf von Scheliha and Jörg Dierken: 217-244. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
  22. Hinske, Norbert. 1996. “Wolffs empirische Psychologie und Kants pragmatische Anthropologie. Zur Diskussion über die Anfänge der Anthropologie im 18. Jahrhundert.” Aufklärung 11/1: 97-107.
  23. Kant, Immanuel. 1914. Metaphysik der Sitten. Immanuel Kant‘s gesammelte Schriften, vol. 6: 203-494. Berlin/Boston, de Gruyter.
  24. Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Metaphysics of Morals. Practical Philosophy, ed. by Mary J. Gregor and Allen Wood. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Kant, Immanuel. 2007. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. In Anthropology, History and Education. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation, vol. 7: 227-429. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  26. Korsch, Dietrich. 2000. “‘Höherer Realismus‘. Schleiermachers Erkenntnistheorie der Religion in der Zweiten Rede.” In 200 Jahre “Reden über die Religion”. Akten des 1. Internationalen Kongresses der Schleiermacher-Gesellschaft, Halle, 14.-17. März 1999, ed. by Ulrich Barth and Claus-Dieter Osthövener: 609-628. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
  27. Kuehn, Manfred. 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Louden, Robert. 2000. Kant‘s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  29. Louden, Robert. 2002. “Introduction”. In Immanuel Kant, Lectures on Philosophical Ethics: vii-xxx. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Louden, Robert. 2011. Kant‘s Human Being. Essays on his Theory of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Mariña, Jacqueline. 2008. “A Critical-Interpretive Analysis of Some Early Writings by Schleiermacher on Kant’s Views of Human Nature And Freedom (1789-1799). With Translated Texts.”. In Schleiermacher on Workings of the Knowing Mind: New Translations, Resources, and Understandings, ed. by Ruth Drucilla Richardson: 11-31. Lewiston (NY): Mellen.
  32. Martinelli, Riccardo. 2010. “Antropologia.” L’universo kantiano. Filosofia, scienze, sapere. Ed. by Stefano Besoli, Claudio La Rocca, and Riccardo Martinelli: 13-52. Macerata: Quodlibet.
  33. Martinelli, Riccardo. 2023. “Schleiermacher recensore dell’Antropologia pragmatica di Kant”. Die Rezension als Medium der Weltliteratur. Ed. by A. Traninger and F. La Manna. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 111-128.
  34. Nowak, Kurt. 1986. Schleiermacher und die Frühromantik. Eine literaturgeschichtliche Studie zum romantischen Religionsverständnis und Menschenbild am Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts in Deutschland. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  35. Purvis, Zachary. 2016. Theology and the University in Nineteenth-Century Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  36. Richardson, Ruth Drucilla (ed.). 2008. Schleiermacher on Workings of the Knowing Mind: New Translations, Resources, and Understandings. Lewiston (NY): Mellen.
  37. Schelling, F. W. Joseph. 1966. On University Studies. Ed. by E.S. Morgan. Athens: Ohio University Press.
  38. Schiller, Friedrich. 1890."Brief an J.W. Goethe" [1798]. In Briefwechsel zwischen Schiller und Goethe in den Jahren 1794 bis 1805 (vol. 2: 1798-1805): 146-147. Stuttgart/Berlin/Leipzig: Union.
  39. [Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel]. 1984a. “Anthropologie von Immanuel Kant. Königsb. 98.” Athaeneum 2.2 [1799]: 300-306. In Kritische Gesamtausgabe, ed. by Hans-Joachim Birkner et al. Erste Abt.: Schriften und Entwürfe, vol. 1.2. Schriften aus der Berliner Zeit (1796-1799), ed. by Günter Meckenstock: 365-369. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
  40. Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel. 1984b. “Über das höchste Gut.” [1789]. In Kritische Gesamtausgabe, ed. by Hans-Joachim Birkner et. al. Erste Abt., Schriften und Entwürfe, vol. 1.1. Jugendschriften 1787-1796, ed. by Günter Meckenstock: 81-128. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
  41. Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel. 1984c. “Über die Freiheit” [undated]. In Kritische Gesamtausgabe, ed. by Hans-Joachim Birkner et. al. Erste Abt., Schriften und Entwürfe, vol. 1.1. Jugendschriften 1787-1796, ed. by Günter Meckenstock: 217-356. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter
  42. Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel. 1988a. On Religion. Speeches to its Cultured Despisers, trans. by Robert Crouter. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  43. [Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel]. 1988b. “Review of Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Die Bestimmung des Menschen.” Athenaeum 3.2 [1800], 283-297. In Kritische Gesamtausgabe, ed. by Hans-Joachim Birkner et al. Erste Abt.: Schriften und Entwürfe, vol. 1.3. Schriften aus der Berliner Zeit (1800-1802), ed. by Günter Meckenstock: 235-248. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
  44. Schings, Hans-Jürgen. 1994. “Vorbemerkungen des Herausgebers.” In Der ganze Mensch: Anthropologie und Literatur im 18. Jahrhundert: 1-6. Stuttgart: Metzler.
  45. Sturm, Thomas. 2009. Kant und die Wissenschaften vom Menschen. Paderborn: Mentis.
  46. Van Zantwijk, Temilo. 2002. “Ist Anthropologie als Wissenschaft möglich? Der ‘Mensch‘ in Schmids ‘enzyklopädischer Topik‘ und Schellings ‘philosophischer Konstruktion‘ der Wissenschaften.” In Schellings philosophische Anthropologie, ed. by Jörg Jansen and Peter L. Österreich: 110-154. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2025
  • Pages: 137-155
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2025 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2025
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2025 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

“Contributions to a Kantology”. Schleiermacher’s Critical Assessment of Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View

Authors

Riccardo Martinelli

Language

English

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0573-3.08

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2025

Copyright Information

© 2025 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

Philosophical Reviews in German Territories (1668-1799)

Book Subtitle

Volume 1

Editors

Marco Sgarbi

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

162

Publication Year

2025

Copyright Information

© 2025 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0573-3

ISBN Print

979-12-215-0572-6

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-0573-3

eISBN (epub)

979-12-215-0574-0

Series Title

Knowledge and its Histories

0

Fulltext
downloads

0

Views

Export Citation

1,374

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

2,545

Book Chapters

4,035,911

Fulltext
downloads

4,923

Authors

from 1036 Research Institutions

of 66 Nations

70

scientific boards

from 375 Research Institutions

of 44 Nations

1,258

Referees

from 383 Research Institutions

of 38 Nations