Contained in:
Book Chapter

Disturbo da gioco d’azzardo patologico e gambling dual disorder: una prospettiva di clinica, endofenotipi e neuroscienze cliniche

  • Arianna Goracci

This brief contribution on GD, the first behavioral addiction, makes evident how gambling can be placed along a continuum whose extremes are represented by recreational play and pathological behavior. Individuals with GD would express a complex syndrome characterized by multiple psychopathological symptoms and different phenotypes that also involved in other mental disorders: it is from these considerations that the term dual disorders was proposed. The identification of other mental disorders in association with gd should not be limited to the diagnostic categories of the dsm-5, but addressed in a transdiagnostic perspective, including personality traits, such as impulsivity, which represent specific phenotypes and endophenotypes that allow gambling dual disorder to be described as a brain and neurodevelopmental disorder.

  • Keywords:
  • Gambling disorder,
  • clinic,
  • endophenotypes,
  • dual disorder,
  • neurobiology,
+ Show More

Arianna Goracci

University of Siena, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0001-5210-3720

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th. Ed.). Washington, DC: APA (2013)
  2. Belin, David, et al. 2016. “In search of predictive endophenotypes in addiction: insights from preclinical research”. Genes Brain and Behavior 15, 1: 74–88 DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12265
  3. Blaszczynski, Alex, e Lia Nower. 2002. “A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling”. Addiction 97, 5: 487–499 DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-4113.2006.00305.x
  4. Blum, Kenneth, et al. 2018. “Our evolved unique pleasure circuit makes humans different from apes: reconsideration of data derived from animal studies”. Journal of Systems and Integrative Neuroscience 4: 1-7 DOI: 10.15761/JSIN.1000191
  5. Chambers, Andrew R., e Marc N. Potenza. 2003. “Neurodevelopment, impulsivity, and adolescent gambling”. Journal of Gambling Studies 19: 53–84 DOI: 10.1023/A:1021275130071
  6. Cowlishaw, Sean, e Jahn K. Hakes. 2015. “Pathological and problem gambling in substance use treatment: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC)”. The American Journal on Addictions 24, 5: 467-474 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.12242
  7. Custer, Roy L. 1984. “Profile of the pathological gambler”. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 45, 12: 35-38 DOI: 10.2307/2870430
  8. Dalley, Jeffrey W., et al. 2007. “Nucleus accumbens D2/3 receptors predict trait impulsivity and cocaine reinforcement”. Science. 315: 1267–70 DOI: 10.1126/science.113707
  9. Echeburúa, Enrique, et al. 2009. Adicción a las nuevas tecnologías en adolescentes y jóvenes. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide
  10. Ferland, Jacqueline-Marie N., et al. 2018. “Examination of the effects of cannabinoid ligands on decision making in a rat gambling task”. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 170: 87– 97 DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2018.05.012
  11. González-Bueso, Vega, et al. 2018. “Association between internet gaming disorder or pathological video-game use and comorbid psychopathology: a comprehensive review”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, 4: 668 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040668
  12. Grant, Jon E., et al. 2005. “Impulse control disorders in adult psychiatric Inpatients”. The American Journal of Psychiatry162, 11: 2184–88 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.11.2184
  13. Griffiths, Mark, Kuss Daria, Pontes Halley M, e Joel Billieux. 2016. “Where do gambling and internet “addictions” belong? The status of “other” addictions”. In The SAGE Handbook of Drug & Alcohol Studies Biological Approaches, a cura di Kim Wolff, Jason White, e Steven Karch, 446–70. London: SAGE Publications Ltd
  14. Ioannidis, Konstantinos, et al. 2019. “Impulsivity in Gambling Disorder and problem gambling: a meta-analysis”. Neuropsychopharmacology 44.8: 1354-1361 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-019-0393-9
  15. Kessler, R. C., et al. 2008. “DSM-IV pathological gambling in the national comorbidity survey replication”. Psychological Medicine 38, 9: 1351–60
  16. Leyton, Marco, e Paul Vezina. 2014. “Dopamine ups and downs in vulnerability to addictions: a neurodevelopmental model”. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 35: 268–76 DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2014.04.002
  17. Lorains, Felicity K., Cowlishaw Sean, e Shane A. Thomas. 2011 “Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys”. Addiction 106, 3: 490–98 DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03300.x
  18. Martins, Silvia S., et al. 2012. “Environmental influences associated with gambling in young adulthood”. Journal of Urban Health 90: 130-40 DOI: 10.1007/s11524-012-9751-1
  19. Moghaddam, Jacquelene F. et al. 2015. “Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in five groups with different severities of gambling: Findings from the National Epidemiologic. Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions”. The American Journal on Addictions 24, 4: 292-298 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.12197
  20. Nower, Lia, et al. 2013. “Subtypes of disordered gamblers: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions” Addiction 108, 4: 789-798 DOI: 10.1111/add.12012
  21. Pittaras, Elsa Cecile, et al. 2016. “Neuronal nicotinic receptors are crucial for tuning of e/I balance in prelimbic cortex and for decision-making processes”. Front Psychiatry 7: 171 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00171
  22. Potenza, Marc N., Balodis Iris M., Derevenky Jeffrey, Grant Jon E., Petry Nancy M., Verdejo Garcia Antonio, e Sarah W. Yip 2019 “Gambling Disorder”. Nature Review Disease Primers 5, 51: 1-21 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-019-0099-7
  23. Santangelo, Gabriella, et al. 2013. “Pathological gambling in parkinson’s disease. A comprehensive review”. Parkinsonism Related Disorders 19, 7: 645–53 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.02.007
  24. Szerman, Nestor. 2002. “Nosología. Clínica de los trastornos por impulsividad”. Psiq Biol. 9: 1–9
  25. Szerman, Nestor, et al. 2020. “Gambling Dual Disorder: A Dual Disorder and Clinical Neuroscience Perspective”. Front Psychiatry 11 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.589155
  26. Szerman, Nestr, e Lola Peris. 2018. “Precision psychiatry and dual disorders”. Journal of Dual Diagnosis 14, 4: 237–46 DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2018.1512727
  27. Volkow, Nora D., et al. 2011. “Positive emotionality is associated with baseline metabolism in orbitofrontal cortex and in regions of the default network”. Mol Psychiatry 16, 8: 818–25 DOI: 10.1038/mp.2011.30
  28. Yakovenko, Igor, e David C. Hodgins. 2018. “A scoping review of co-morbidity in individuals with disordered gambling”. International Gambling Studies 18, 1: 143–72 DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2017.1364400
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2024
  • Pages: 13-25

XML
  • Publication Year: 2024

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Disturbo da gioco d’azzardo patologico e gambling dual disorder: una prospettiva di clinica, endofenotipi e neuroscienze cliniche

Authors

Arianna Goracci

Language

Italian

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0444-6.04

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY-SA 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

Il gioco d’azzardo: una prospettiva multidisciplinare

Book Subtitle

Atti del convegno tenutosi presso il Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza dell’Università degli Studi di Siena il 1° dicembre 2023

Editors

Mario Perini

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

246

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY-SA 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press, USiena Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0444-6

ISBN Print

979-12-215-0443-9

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-0444-6

eISBN (epub)

979-12-215-0445-3

Series Title

Strumenti del Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza di Siena

10

Fulltext
downloads

16

Views

Export Citation

1,340

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

2,191

Book Chapters

3,790,127

Fulltext
downloads

4,399

Authors

from 923 Research Institutions

of 65 Nations

64

scientific boards

from 348 Research Institutions

of 43 Nations

1,247

Referees

from 380 Research Institutions

of 38 Nations