Contained in:
Book Chapter

Commodification o giustizia ambientale? I PES come strumento di governance del valore della natura

  • Davide Marino

Having defined the fundamental concepts related to the debate on ecosystem services within the framework of Socio-Ecological Systems, and starting from a critique of GDP and traditional accounting systems, new tools and methodologies functional to measuring the well-being and wealth of society are illustrated, which include the accounting of natural capital and associated ecosystem services. The PES (Payments for Ecosystem Services) tool is studied in detail and the possibility of using it for territorial rebalancing and social justice purposes is analysed.

  • Keywords:
  • Natural Capital,
  • Payments for Ecosystem Services,
  • Socio-Ecological System (SES),
  • economic assessment of the environment,
  • Capitalocene,
+ Show More

Davide Marino

University of Molise, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0003-2471-6612

  1. Avallone G., Leonardi E. (2018), “Anthropocene? More like ‘Capitalocene’”, Il Manifesto Global, 10/6/2018, <https://global.ilmanifesto.it/anthropocene-more-like-capitalocene/> (02/2020).
  2. Barbero A., Leonardi E. (2017), “Introduzione”, in Moore J.W. (2017), Antropocene o Capitalocene? Scenari di ecologia-mondo nell’era della crisi planetaria, Ombre Corte, Verona, pp. 1-7.
  3. Borghi E. (2017), Piccole Italie, Donzelli, Roma.
  4. Costanza R., D’Arge R., De Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O’Neill R., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., Van Den Belt M. (1997), “Value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital”, Nature, vol. 387, n. 6630, pp. 253-260.
  5. Costanza R., Daly H.E. (1992), “Natural capital and sustainable development”, Conservation Biology, vol. 6, n. 1, pp. 37-46.
  6. Costanza R., De Groot R., Braat L., Kubiszewski I., Fioramonti L., Sutton P., Farber P., Grasso M. (2017), “Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to gos?”, Ecosystem Services, n. 28, pp. 1-16.
  7. Daily G. (1997), Nature’s sservices: societal dependence on natural ecosystems, Island Press, Washington.
  8. Daly H.E., Cobb J.B. Jr. (1994), Un’economia per il bene comune. Il nuovo paradigma economico orientato verso la comunità, l’ambiente e un futuro ecologicamente sostenibile, Red Edizioni, Como (ed. or. 1989).
  9. Georgescu-Roegen N. (1978), “De la science économique à la bioéconomie”, Revue d’économie politique, vol. 88, n. 3, pp. 337-382.
  10. Gómez-Baggethun E., Ruiz-Pérez M. (2011), “Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services”, Progress in Physical Geography, vol. 35, n. 5, pp. 613-628.
  11. Haines-Young R.H., Potschin M. (2009), Methodologies for defining and assessing ecosystem services. Final report, JNCC, London.
  12. Mace G.M. (2014), “Whose conservation?”, Science, n. 345, pp. 1558-1560.
  13. Marino D., Palmieri M. (2017), “Investing in nature: working with public expenditure and private payments for a new governance model”, in Paracchini M.L., Zingari P.C., Blasi C. (a cura di), Re-connecting natural and cultural capital. Contributions from science and policy, Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
  14. MEA - Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005), Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis, Island Press, Washington.
  15. Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., Behrens W.W. (1972), I limiti dello sviluppo. Rapporto del System Dynamics Group Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) per il progetto del Club di Roma sui dilemmi dell’umanità, Mondadori, Milano.
  16. Monbiot G. (2018), “The UK government wants to put a price on nature –   but that will destroy it”, The Guardian, 15 Maggio 2018.
  17. Moore J.W. (2017), Antropocene o Capitalocene? Scenari di ecologia-mondo nell’era della crisi planetaria, Ombre Corte, Verona.
  18. Muradian R., Corbera E., Pascual U., Kosoy N., May P. (2010), “Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for ecosystem services”, Ecological Economics, n. 69, pp. 1202-1208.
  19. Putnam R.D. (1995), “Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital”, Journal of Democracy, vol. 6, n. 1, pp. 65-78.
  20. Rosés J., Wolf N. (2018), “The return of regional inequality: Europe from 1900 to today”, VOX, <https://voxeu.org/article/return-regional-inequality-europe-1900-today> (02/2020).
  21. Wunder S. (2005), Payments for Environmental Services: some nuts and bolts, Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta.
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2020
  • Pages: 87-96
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2020 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2020
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2020 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Commodification o giustizia ambientale? I PES come strumento di governance del valore della natura

Authors

Davide Marino

Language

Italian

DOI

10.36253/978-88-5518-050-4.11

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2020

Copyright Information

© 2020 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

I servizi ecosistemici nella pianificazione bioregionale

Editors

Daniela Poli

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

152

Publication Year

2020

Copyright Information

© 2020 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/978-88-5518-050-4

ISBN Print

978-88-5518-049-8

eISBN (pdf)

978-88-5518-050-4

eISBN (xml)

978-88-5518-051-1

Series Title

Territori

Series ISSN

2704-5978

Series E-ISSN

2704-579X

171

Fulltext
downloads

259

Views

Export Citation

1,274

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

1,505

Book Chapters

2,755,777

Fulltext
downloads

3,493

Authors

from 707 Research Institutions

of 55 Nations

58

scientific boards

from 321 Research Institutions

of 40 Nations

1,124

Referees

from 333 Research Institutions

of 35 Nations