- Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate
- Edited by Adelino Cattani, Bruno Mastroianni
Il dibattito come rischio educativo
- Maria Załęska
- © 2021 Author(s) |
- CC BY 4.0
- DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.06
«It is better to debate a question without settling it than to settle a question without debating it», says a quote from Joseph Joubert. Debate is one of the most valued text genres and is therefore included in curricular or extracurricular academic activities. What do we teach by teaching how to debate? What do students learn by learning how to debate? They can compete, collaborate and might even develop a new skill. Since concrete educational choices reflect a certain underlying educational philosophy, in what follows the model proposed by Biesta (2010,2016,2017) will be illustrated. The theoretical knowledge drawn from this framework will then be applied to the analysis of the Oxford Debate, in the version adopted by the regulated debate tournaments in Poland as well as to the discussion of a modification of the Oxford Debate itself, inspired by the concept of 'risk of education' (or rather, 'The Beautiful risk of educatio', as the title of one of Biesta’s books reads).
- Keywords:
- Argumentation Theory,
- debate,
- education,
University of Warsaw, Poland - ORCID: 0000-0003-2973-0173
- Biesta, G. J. J. 2010. Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, Co: Paradigm Publishers.
- Biesta, G. J. J. 2016. The beautiful risk of education. London/New York: Routledge.
- Biesta, G. J. J. 2017. The rediscovery of teaching. London/New York: Routledge.
- Cattani, A. 2018. Palestra di botta e risposta. Per una formazione al dibattito. Padova: Libreriauniversitaria.it.
- Cattani, A. 2019. Avere ragione. Piccolo manuale di retorica dialogica. Roma: Dino Audino.
- Cattani, A., e N. Varisco. 2019. Dibattito argomentato e regolamentato. Teoria e pratica di una Palestra di botta e risposta. Torino: Loescher.
- Cunliffe, A. L. 2004. “On Becoming a Critically Reflexive Practitioner.” Journal of Management Education 28 (4): 407-26.
- Field, J. 2000. Lifelong learning and the new educational order. Stroke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham.
- Joubert, J. 1838. Recueil des pensées de M. Joubert. Paris: Hachette Livre-BNF.
- Mouffe, C. 2016. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
- Załęska, M. 2003. “Non scholae, sed vitae discimus. Retoryka a sprawność pisania w języku obcym.” [Non scholae, sed vitae discimus. Rhetoric and writing competence in a foreign language] In Nauczanie retoryki w teorii i praktyce, a cura di J. Z. Lichański
- Załęska, M. 2014a. Retorica della linguistica. Scienza, struttura, scrittura, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
- Załęska, M. 2014b. “Retoryka i glottodydaktyka: nauczanie języka włoskiego.” [Rhetoric and glottodidactics: teaching the Italian language] Języki Obce w Szkole 3: 35-9.
- Załęska, M. 2015. “Glottodidattica e retorica: dall’ars recte loquendi verso l’ars bene dicendi.” In Creatività nell’insegnamento dell’italiano come lingua straniera. Dalle parole ai testi, a cura di M. Załęska, 279-97. Warszawa: Katedra Italianistyki – U
Chapter Information
Chapter Title
Il dibattito come rischio educativo
Authors
Maria Załęska
Language
Italian
DOI
10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.06
Peer Reviewed
Publication Year
2021
Copyright Information
© 2021 Author(s)
Content License
Metadata License
Bibliographic Information
Book Title
Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate
Editors
Adelino Cattani, Bruno Mastroianni
Peer Reviewed
Number of Pages
168
Publication Year
2021
Copyright Information
© 2021 Author(s)
Content License
Metadata License
Publisher Name
Firenze University Press
DOI
10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1
ISBN Print
978-88-5518-328-4
eISBN (pdf)
978-88-5518-329-1
Series Title
Communication and Philosophical Cultures. Researches and Instruments
Series ISSN
2975-1152
Series E-ISSN
2975-1233