Contained in:
Book Chapter

Il metodo comparativo nello studio dei rapporti tra il Domostroj e i suoi equivalenti europei

  • Eugène Priadko

The article adresses the well-known question about the eventual links between the Old Russian Domostroi and the European domestic handbooks and focuses on the aporia to which lead all the previous comparative works. The methodological character of the impasse apears clearly when we analyze those works in the light of a clearly defined comparative method. As a result, the author suggests to address the relationships between the Domostroi and its European analogues no more from the traditional literary point of view but from a historical one.

  • Keywords:
  • Domostroi,
  • European Domestic Handbooks,
  • Comparative Method,
  • Comparative History,
+ Show More

Eugène Priadko

Sorbonne University, France

  1. Babudri, F. 1954. La figura del rimatore barese Schiavo nell’ambiente sociale e letterario duecentesco di Puglia e d’Italia. Società di Storia Patria per la Puglia, Collezione del Premio Regionale di Studi Storici, I. Bari.
  2. Bloch, M. 1928. “Pour une histoire comparée des sociétés européennes”. Revue de synthèse historique, XLVI: 315-50.
  3. Bloncourt-Herselin, J., Durand, R.-H. 1965. Les auteurs italiens: textes choisis, littérature, histoire, civilisation. Paris.
  4. Brereton, G.E., Ferrier, J.M. (a cura di). 2010. Le Mesnagier de Paris. Le Livre de Poche.
  5. Domostroj. 1994. Domostroj. A cura di V.V. Kolesov, V.V. Roždestvenskaja. Sankt-Peterburg.
  6. Erben, K.J. (a cura di). 1852. Tomáše ze Štitného knižky šestery o obecných věcech křesťanských. Praha.
  7. Hroch, M. 1985. Social Preconditions of National Revival in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of the Social Composition of Patriotic Groups among the Smaller European Nations. Cambridge.
  8. Janin, V.L., Zaliznjak, A.A., Gippius, A.A. (a cura di). 2004. Novgorodskije gramoty na bereste (iz raskopok 1997-2000 gg.). Moskva.
  9. Kaštanov, S.M. 1992. “O tipe Russkogo gosudarstva XIVXVI vv.”, in Čtenija pamjati V.B. Kobrina “Problemy otečestvenoj istorii i kul’tury perioda feodalizma”. Tezisy dokladov i soobščenij. Moskva: 85-92.
  10. Kolesov, V.V. (a cura di). 1990. Domostroj. Moskva.
  11. Kolesov, V.V. 1994. Domostroj kak pamjatnik srednevekovoj kul’tury, in Domostroj. A cura di V.V. Kolesov e V.V. Roždestvenskaja. Sankt-Peterburg: 301-356.
  12. Krom, M.M. 2005. “La monarchie russe à la lumière de la crise politique des années 1530-1540”. Cahiers du monde russe, 46: 211-218.
  13. Krom, M.M. 2015. Vvedenije v istoričeskuju komparativistiku. Sankt-Peterburg.
  14. Nekrasov, I.S. 1872. “Opyt istoriko-literaturnogo issledovanija o proisvoždenii drevnerusskogo Domostroja”. Čtenija v Imperatorskom obščestve istorii i drevnostej rossijskich, I. Issledovanija, 3: 1-184.
  15. Orlov, A. 1917. Domostroj. Izsledovanije, čast’ I. Moskva.
  16. Pančenko, A.M. (a cura di). 1970. Russkaja sillabičeskaja poesija XVII-XVIII vv. Leningrad.
  17. Pandolfini, A. 1802. Trattato del governo della famiglia d’Agnolo Pandolfini colla vita del medesimo scritta da Vespasiano da Bisticci. Milano.
  18. Poukka, H. 1966. “O vozmožnom pol’skom istočnike Domostroja”. Scando-Slavia, XII: 119-122.
  19. Pouncy, C.J. 1985. The Domostroi as a Source for Muscovite History. Stanford University, Ph.D.
  20. Romagnoli, G. (a cura di). 1865. Dottrina dello schiavo di Bari. Secondo la lezione di tre antichi testi a penna. Bologna.
  21. Sewell, W.H. 1967. “Marc Bloch and the Logic of Comparative History”. History and Theory, VI.2: 208-218.
  22. Sreznevskij, I.I. 1893. Materialy dlja slovarja drevne-russkogo slovarja po pis’mennym pamjatnikam, I (A-K). Sankt-Peterburg.
  23. Voisine-Jechova, H. 2001. Histoire de la littérature tchèque. Fayard.
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2017
  • Pages: 67-81
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2017 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2017
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2017 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Il metodo comparativo nello studio dei rapporti tra il Domostroj e i suoi equivalenti europei

Authors

Eugène Priadko

Language

Italian

DOI

10.36253/978-88-6453-507-4.07

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2017

Copyright Information

© 2017 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

Russia, Oriente slavo e Occidente europeo. Fratture e integrazioni nella storia e nella civiltà letteraria

Book Subtitle

Fratture e integrazioni nella storia e nella civiltà letteraria

Editors

Claudia Pieralli, Claire Delaunay, Eugène Priadko

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2017

Copyright Information

© 2017 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/978-88-6453-507-4

eISBN (pdf)

978-88-6453-507-4

eISBN (xml)

978-88-9273-190-5

Series Title

Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici

Series ISSN

2612-7687

Series E-ISSN

2612-7679

79

Fulltext
downloads

144

Views

Export Citation

1,301

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

1,746

Book Chapters

3,161,365

Fulltext
downloads

3,977

Authors

from 819 Research Institutions

of 63 Nations

63

scientific boards

from 340 Research Institutions

of 43 Nations

1,140

Referees

from 342 Research Institutions

of 36 Nations