Contained in:
Book Chapter

Narrative Heroes: giocare per riscrivere il copione del bullismo e del cyberbullismo

  • Elena Serritella

Bullying and cyberbullying are still relevant issues of national and international concern. The literature has shown that these forms of peer violence have an important cultural basis, linked to shared social norms that are reflected in the dominant narratives of the reference group. In order to influence individual attitudes, it is therefore necessary to influence the whole community. Furthermore, the use of new technologies and gamification seem to maximise the potential for change in interventions implemented on them. Based on the results of a preliminary systematic review of the literature on existing interventions to prevent bullying and cyberbullying using technology, the project involves the design, implementation and validation of a gaming application (Narrative Heroes) aimed at preventing and counteracting bullying and cyberbullying among adolescents by harnessing the power of generating counter-narratives in an online discussion. The aim is to stimulate an active change in the participants and a change in the narratives of the norms shared by the context, which will then be reflected in a change in attitudes and beliefs towards bullying and cyberbullying, both at an individual and group level.

  • Keywords:
  • Bullying,
  • Cyberbullying,
  • Gamification,
  • Intervention,
  • Prevention,
+ Show More

Elena Serritella

University of Florence, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0002-0605-3125

  1. Bamberg, Michael, e Molly Andrews, edited by. 2004. Considering Counter-Narratives: Narrating, Resisting, Making Sense. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI: 10.1075/sin.4
  2. European Commission. 2020. Anti-bullying Practices from the Repository of the European Platform for Investing in Children (EPIC). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. <https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/013374> (2024-02-01).
  3. Gaffney, Hannah, Ttofi, Maria M., e David P. Farrington. 2021a. “Effectiveness of School-Based Programs to Reduce Bullying Perpetration and Victimazion: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Campbell Systematic Reviews 17 (2): e1143. DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1143
  4. Gaffney, Hannah, Ttofi, Maria M., e David P. Farrington. 2021b. “What Works in Anti-Bullying Programs? Analysis of Effective Intervention Components.” Journal of School Psychology 85: 37-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.002
  5. HBSC. 2023. La sorveglianza HBSC 2022. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children: principali risultati dello studio italiano tra i ragazzi di 11, 13, 15 e 17 anni. <https://www.sportesalute.eu/images/studi-e-dati-dello-sport/schede/2023/126-HBSC_Schede_Sintesi.pdf> (2024-02-01).
  6. Joinson, Adam, McKenna, Katelyn Y.A., Postmes, Tom, e Ulf Reips, edited by. 2007. Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199561803.001.0001
  7. Lambert, Joe. 20093 (2002). Digital Storytelling. Capturing Lives, Creating Community. Berkeley: Digital Diner Press.
  8. Menesini, Ersilia, e Christiane Spiel. 2012. “Introduction: Cyberbullying: Development, Consequences, Risk and Protective Factors.” European Journal of Developmental Psychology 9 (2): 163-67. DOI: 10.1080/17405629.2011.652833
  9. Olweus, Dan. 1993. Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  10. Seaborn, Katie, e Deborah I. Fels. 2015. “Gamification in Theory and Action: A Survey.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74: 14-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
  11. Silverman, Tanya, Stewart, Christopher J., Amanullah, Zahed, e Birdwell, Jonathan. 2016. The Impact of Counter-Narratives. Insights from a Year-Long Cross-Platform Pilot Study of Counter-Narrative Curation, Targeting, Evaluation and Impact. London: Institute for Strategic Dialogue. <https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Impact-of-Counter-Narratives_ONLINE_1.pdf> (2024-02-01).
  12. Spears, Russell, e Tom Postmes. 2015. “Group Identity, Social Influence, and Collective Action Online: Extensions and Applications of the SIDE Model.” In The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology, edited by S.Shyam Sundar, 23-46. Malden-Oxford-Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118426456.ch2
  13. Stroud, Scott R., e William Cox. 2018. “The Varieties of Feminist Counterspeech in the Misogynistic Online World”. In Mediating Misogyny: Gender, Technology, and Harassment, edited by J.R. Vickery e T. Everbach, 293-310. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6_15
  14. UNICEF. 2018. “Half of World’s Teens Experience Peer Violence in and Around School.” <https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/half-worlds-teens-experience-peer-violence-and-around-school-unicef> (2024-02-01).
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2024
  • Pages: 307-311
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2024 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2024
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2024 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Narrative Heroes: giocare per riscrivere il copione del bullismo e del cyberbullismo

Authors

Elena Serritella

Language

Italian

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0504-7.36

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

La formazione alla ricerca

Book Subtitle

Il dottorato fra qualità e prospettive future

Editors

Vanna Boffo, Fabio Togni

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

320

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0504-7

ISBN Print

979-12-215-0503-0

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-0504-7

eISBN (xml)

979-12-215-0505-4

Series Title

Studies on Adult Learning and Education

Series ISSN

2704-596X

Series E-ISSN

2704-5781

0

Fulltext
downloads

0

Views

Export Citation

1,343

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

2,222

Book Chapters

3,790,127

Fulltext
downloads

4,410

Authors

from 923 Research Institutions

of 65 Nations

64

scientific boards

from 348 Research Institutions

of 43 Nations

1,248

Referees

from 381 Research Institutions

of 38 Nations