Contained in:
Book Chapter

Integrated GeoBIM Requirements Definition for Digital Building Permit

  • Silvia Mastrolembo Ventura
  • Sara Comai
  • Francesca Noardo
  • Kavita Raj
  • Angelo Luigi Camillo CIRIBINI

The development of methods for building permit issuing supported by digital tools could improve the current mostly manual procedures for processing regulatory information and related compliance processes. Several studies are currently addressing the challenge of building permit digitalisation, mostly considering building information models as the source data for automating the regulations checks. However, many of the main checks, that usually represent the major bottlenecks of the compliance checking process, need a joint representation of the new proposed construction and its context, which could be effectively represented in a (3D) geographical information system. This study aims at supporting the automation of building permitting by addressing the rule interpretation as an input to model preparation and code checking. In particular, the regulations interpretation in this case is functional to the definition of data requirements and checking rules referring to a joint GIS and BIM (GeoBIM) framework. The approach is developed and tested in the case of an Italian municipality of 45.000 inhabitants. This paper describes the interpretation of distance-related regulations by adopting a semantic mark-up and sentence-centric approach. The resulting level of information need has been represented in conceptual models (object, attributes, relationships) as an essential input to city and building model preparation. While the case study is specific in location and regulations, the type of issues encountered are a generally applicable example for the building permit use case. Future works will extend the methodology to additional three European municipalities between 45.000 and 1.000.000 inhabitants, in three European countries, to address the need for a flexible and scalable approach

  • Keywords:
  • Digital building permit; Rule interpretation; GeoBIM; Information requirements; Building-urban interaction,
+ Show More

Silvia Mastrolembo Ventura

University of Brescia, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0001-9446-8824

Sara Comai

University of Brescia, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0001-6559-6624

Francesca Noardo

Open Geospatial Consortium, Belgium - ORCID: 0000-0003-2269-5336

Kavita Raj

University of Brescia, Italy

Angelo Luigi Camillo CIRIBINI

University of Brescia, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0001-8863-3440

  1. Arroyo Ohori, K., Diakité, A., Krijnen, T., Ledoux, H., & Stoter, J. (2018). Processing BIM and GIS models in practice: experiences and recommendations from a GeoBIM project in the Netherlands. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(8), 311.
  2. Dimyadi, J., Governatori, G., & Amor, R. (2017). Evaluating legaldocml and legalruleml as a standard for sharing normative information in the aec/fm domain. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Computing in Construction (JC3) (Vol. 1, pp. 637-644). Heraklion, Greece: Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
  3. Eastman, C., Lee, J. M., Jeong, Y. S., & Lee, J. K. (2009). Automatic rule-based checking of building designs. Automation in construction, 18(8), 1011-1033.
  4. Fauth, J., & Soibelman, L. (2022). Conceptual framework for building permit process modeling: Lessons learned from a comparison between Germany and the United States regarding the as-is building permit processes. Buildings, 12(5), 638.
  5. Guler, D., & Yomralioglu, T. (2021). A reformative framework for processes from building permit issuing to property ownership in Turkey. Land Use Policy, 101, 105115.
  6. Hjelseth, E., & Nisbet, N. (2011). Capturing normative constraints by use of the semantic mark-up RASE methodology. In Proceedings of CIB W78-W102 Conference (pp. 1-10).
  7. Hobeika, N., Van Liempt, J., Noardo, F., Arroyo Ohori, K., & Stoter, J. (2022). GeoBIM information to check digital building permit regulations. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 43, 529-535.
  8. Laurini, R., & Thompson, D. (1992). Fundamentals of spatial information systems (Vol. 37). Academic press.
  9. Malsane, S., Matthews, J., Lockley, S., Love, P. E., & Greenwood, D. (2015). Development of an object model for automated compliance checking. Automation in construction, 49, 51-58.
  10. Nisbet, N., Ma, L., & Aksenova, G. (2022). Presentations of rase knowledge mark-up. In EC3 Conference 2022. Available online: https://ec-3.org/publications/conferences/EC32022/papers/EC32022_162.pdf
  11. Noardo, F., Guler, D., Fauth, J., Malacarne, G., Mastrolembo Ventura, S., Azenha, M., ... & Senger, L. (2022). Unveiling the actual progress of Digital Building Permit: Getting awareness through a critical state of the art review. Building and Environment, 213, 108854.
  12. Noardo, F., Wu, T., Arroyo Ohori, K., Krijnen, T., Tezerdi, H., & Stoter, J. (2020). Geobim for digital building permit process: Learning from a case study in Rotterdam. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 6, 151-158.
  13. Preidel, C., & Borrmann, A. (2018). BIM-based code compliance checking. Building information modeling: Technology foundations and industry practice, 367-381.
  14. Song, J., Kim, J., & Lee, J. K. (2018). NLP and deep learning-based analysis of building regulations to support automated rule checking system. In ISARC. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (Vol. 35, pp. 1-7). IAARC Publications.
  15. Tomczak, A., v Berlo, L., Krijnen, T., Borrmann, A., & Bolpagni, M. (2022). A review of methods to specify information requirements in digital construction projects. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1101, No. 9, p. 092024). IOP Publishing.
  16. Zhang, J., & El-Gohary, N. M. (2017). Integrating semantic NLP and logic reasoning into a unified system for fully-automated code checking. Automation in construction, 73, 45-57.
  17. Zhang, Z., Ma, L., & Nisbet, N. (2023). Unpacking Ambiguity in Building Requirements to Support Automated Compliance Checking. Journal of Management in Engineering, 39(5), 04023033.
  18. Object Management Group, 2023. https://www.uml.org. Last accessed: August 2023.
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2023
  • Pages: 526-537

XML
  • Publication Year: 2023

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Integrated GeoBIM Requirements Definition for Digital Building Permit

Authors

Silvia Mastrolembo Ventura, Sara Comai, Francesca Noardo, Kavita Raj, Angelo Luigi Camillo CIRIBINI

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0289-3.51

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2023

Copyright Information

© 2023 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY-NC 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

CONVR 2023 - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality

Book Subtitle

Managing the Digital Transformation of Construction Industry

Editors

Pietro Capone, Vito Getuli, Farzad Pour Rahimian, Nashwan Dawood, Alessandro Bruttini, Tommaso Sorbi

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2023

Copyright Information

© 2023 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY-NC 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0289-3

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-0289-3

eISBN (xml)

979-12-215-0257-2

Series Title

Proceedings e report

Series ISSN

2704-601X

Series E-ISSN

2704-5846

39

Fulltext
downloads

43

Views

Export Citation

1,308

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

1,962

Book Chapters

3,290,448

Fulltext
downloads

4,155

Authors

from 869 Research Institutions

of 64 Nations

63

scientific boards

from 340 Research Institutions

of 43 Nations

1,150

Referees

from 345 Research Institutions

of 37 Nations