Contained in:
Book Chapter

Lavoro e dinamica tecnologica: great reshuffle, great upgrade, work-life balance

  • Mauro Lombardi
  • Marika Macchi

The onset of concomitant global crises generates unexpected phenomena: “great resignation, great upgrade, reshuffle”, by people both with lower levels of education and low salaries, and with higher levels of education and retributions. Our contribution highlights some factors underlying these processes: 1) search for jobs with a greater degree of personal fulfilment. 2) Aspiration for a better balance between work and private life (better “work-life balance”). 3) Desire for a work environment free of "toxic company culture". Consequently, job switching and reshuffling of work activities are cross-sectoral, taking on different forms in the various countries, including Italy. This leads to important challenges for the organizational models of firms and public labour policies.

  • Keywords:
  • great resignation,
  • great reshuffling,
  • quiet quitting,
  • hustle culture,
+ Show More

Mauro Lombardi

University of Florence, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0002-3234-7039

Marika Macchi

University of Florence, Italy - ORCID: 0009-0008-6677-0995

  1. Aksoy, C. G., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Dolls, M., and P. Zarate. 2022. Working from home around the world (No. w30446). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  2. Alexander, A., De Smet, A., and M. Mysore. 2020. “Reimagining the postpandemic workforce.” McKinsey Quarterly. <https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/reimagining-the-postpandemic-workforce#/> (2024-03-11).
  3. Andrews, D. et al. 2019. “Wage Growth in Australia: Lessons from Longitudinal Microdata, Australian Government.” The Treasury, July 19.
  4. Armillei, F. 2021. “Si apre la stagione delle grandi dimissioni?” Lavoce.info, 5 ottobre.
  5. Armillei, F. 2022. “Dove sono andati a finire i lavoratori che si sono dimessi?” Lavoce.info, 5 maggio.
  6. Chen, J. K., and T. Sriphon. 2021. “Perspective on COVID-19 pandemic factors impacting organizational leadership.” Sustainability 13, 6: 3230.
  7. CIPD, The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. 2022. “The great resignation-fact or fiction?”. <https://www.cipd.org/uk/views-and-insights/thought-leadership/cipd-voice/great-resignation-fact-fiction/> (2022-02-21).
  8. Clark, P. 2021. “Money isn’t everything in the Great-Re-evaluation.” Financial Times. <https://www.ft.com/content/411faba8-3d75-4c71-86d2-5b1b308dfc9a> (2021-10-03).
  9. Cohen, R. 2019. “The Harm in Hustle Culture.” New York Times, February 1.
  10. Combs, V., 2021. “3 signs the Great Resignation is still going strong.” TechRepublic, October 1, 2021.
  11. Curtis, L. 2021. “Why The Big Quit Is Happening And Why Every Boss Should Embrace It.” Forbes, June 30.
  12. Griffith, E. 2019. “Why Are Young People Pretending to Love Work?” New York Times, January 26.
  13. ILO. 2023. Working Time and Work-Life Balance Around the World, <https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_864222/lang--it/index.htm> (2023-01-06).
  14. IMF. 2020. Kurzarbeit: Germany’s Short-Time Work Benefit. <https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2020/06/11/na061120-kurzarbeit-germanys-short-time-work-benefit#:~:text=features%20of%20Kurzarbeit%3F-,Kurzarbeit%20is%20a%20social%20insurance%20program%20whereby%20employers%20reduce%20their,more%20for%20workers%20with%20children> (2020-06-15).
  15. Klotz, A., and M. C. Bolino. 2022. “When Quiet Quitting is Worse The Real Things.” Harvard Business Review, September 15.
  16. Masterson, V. 2022. “What is quiet quitting.” Word Economic Forum, September 2.
  17. Osservatorio HR Innovation Practice. 2022. Mercato del lavoro: le Grandi Dimissioni portano nuove sfide per le Direzioni HR. <https://www.osservatori.net/it/ricerche/comunicati-stampa/mercato-lavoro-italia-risorse-umane> (2024-03-11).
  18. Parker, K., J. M Horowitz. 2022. “Majority of workers who quit a job in 2021 cite low pay, no opportunities for advancement, feeling disrespected.” Pew Research Center, March 9.
  19. Roose, R. 2021. “Welcome to the YOLO Economy.” The New York Times, April 21.
  20. Roslanski, R. 2021. “Navigating the Great Reshuffle.” <https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/navigating-great-reshuffle-ryan-roslansky/> (2021-09-09).
  21. Sull, D., Sull, C., and B. Zweig. 2022. “Toxic Culture Is Driving the Great Resignation.” MIT Sloan Management Review, January 1.
  22. The Economist. 2016. “Automation and anxiety. Will smarter machines cause mass unemployment?” 25 June.
  23. Williams, A. 2022. “How quiet quitters gain from doing less work.” DW Deutsche Welle (international broadcast), September 14.
  24. Zenger, J., and J. Folkman 2022. “Quiet Quitting Is About Bad Bosses, Not Bad Employees.” Harvard Business Review.
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2024
  • Pages: 1609-1616
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2024 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2024
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2024 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Lavoro e dinamica tecnologica: great reshuffle, great upgrade, work-life balance

Authors

Mauro Lombardi, Marika Macchi

Language

Italian

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.177

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

Idee di lavoro e di ozio per la nostra civiltà

Editors

Giovanni Mari, Francesco Ammannati, Stefano Brogi, Tiziana Faitini, Arianna Fermani, Francesco Seghezzi, Annalisa Tonarelli

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

1894

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7

ISBN Print

979-12-215-0245-9

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-0319-7

eISBN (epub)

979-12-215-0320-3

Series Title

Studi e saggi

Series ISSN

2704-6478

Series E-ISSN

2704-5919

0

Fulltext
downloads

0

Views

Export Citation

1,305

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

1,921

Book Chapters

3,161,365

Fulltext
downloads

4,104

Authors

from 846 Research Institutions

of 63 Nations

63

scientific boards

from 339 Research Institutions

of 43 Nations

1,150

Referees

from 345 Research Institutions

of 37 Nations