Contained in:
Book Chapter

Marta e Maria. Prospettive di genere su lavoro e ozio nella tradizione del primo cristianesimo

  • Maria Dell'Isola

The present paper attempts to analyze the relevance of work in early Christianity by adopting a gender perspective. The New Testament episode of Martha and Mary (Lk 10:38-42) will be used as a privileged case study to emphasize the connection between work and idleness against the wider theoretical background of the temporally oriented economic structure of ancient society. The episode of Martha and Mary, with its emphasis on domestic work is a highly representative case in this regard. By focusing on the nexus between temporality, economy and working activity, an attempt will therefore be made to frame female agency within the broader framework of gender roles as they were conceived in ancient Mediterranean society.

  • Keywords:
  • Gender,
  • Work,
  • Temporality,
  • Christianity,
+ Show More

Maria Dell'Isola

University of Milan La Statale, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0003-2167-7179

  1. Alciati, Roberto, a cura di. 2019. Conversazioni con i Padri di Giovanni Cassiano. Milano: Paoline.
  2. Brennan, Irene. 1971. “Women in the Gospels.” New Blackfriars 52: 291-99.
  3. Carrozzi, Luigi, traduzione e note di. 1983. Opere di Sant’Agostino. Discorsi 2./2 (86-116): Sul Nuovo Testamento. Roma: Città Nuova.
  4. Carter, Warren. 1996. “Getting Martha out of the Kitchen: Luke 10:38-42 Again.” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly April 58, 2: 264-80.
  5. D’Angelo, Mary Rose. 1990. “Women in Luke-Acts: A Redactional View.” Journal of Biblical Literature 109, 3: 441-61.
  6. De Beauvoir, Simone. 2016. Il secondo sesso, traduzione di Roberto Cantini e Mario Andreose. Milano: Il Saggiatore. (trad. di Le Deuxième Sexe. Paris: Gallimard, 1949).
  7. Dell’Isola, Maria. 2020. “Shaping Women’s Agency Through Temporality in The Life and Activity of the Holy and Blessed Teacher Syncletica.” Studia Philologica Valentina 19: 13-31.
  8. Dell’Isola, Maria. 2022. “Waiting for the End. Two Case Studies on the Relationship Between Time and Gender in Early Christianity.” Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum 26, 3: 446-72.
  9. Dell’Isola, Maria. 2023. “How Temporality Shapes Social Structure in the Acts of Thomas.” Vigiliae Christianae 77, 2: 155-75.
  10. Dinshaw, Carolyn. 2012. How Soon is Now? Medieval Texts, Amateur Readers, and the Queerness of Time. Durham: Duke University Press.
  11. Ernst, Allie, M. 2009. Martha from the Margins. The Authority of Martha in Early Christian Tradition. Leiden-Boston: Brill.
  12. Gauthier, Claudine. 2013. “Temps et eschatology.” Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions 162: 123-41.
  13. Grant, Frederick, C. 1917. “The Eschatology of the Second Century.” The American Journal of Theology 21: 193-211.
  14. Gurvitch, Georges. 1961. La multiplicité de temps sociaux. Paris: Centre de documentation universitaire.
  15. Karaman, Elif Hilal. 2018. Ephesian Women in Greco-Roman and Early Christian Perspective. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
  16. Kattan Gribetz, Sarit, and Kaye, Lynn. 2019. “The Temporal Turn in Ancient Judaism and Jewish Studies.” Currents in Biblical Research 17: 332-95.
  17. Kristeva, Julia. 1979. “Le Temps des femmes.” Cahiers de Recherche de Sciences des Textes et Documents 34, 44: 5-19.
  18. La Bibbia di Gerusalemme. 2011. Bologna: Dehoniane.
  19. Lambot, Cyrille, edidit. 1950. Sancti Aurelii Augustini Sermones selecti duodeviginti. Ultraiecti-Bruxellis: In Aedibus Spectrum.
  20. Petschenig, Michael, hrsg. von. 2004. Iohannis Cassiani Conlationes XXIIII. Wien: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
  21. Pickard, Susan. 2020. “Waiting Like a Girl? The Temporal Constitution of Femininity as a Factor in Gender Inequality.” The British Journal of Sociology 71: 314-27.
  22. Rauer, Max, hrsg. von. 1959. Origenes Fragmente zum Lukasevangelium. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
  23. Rebillard, Éric. 2017. Greek and Latin Narratives about the Ancient Martyrs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  24. Rubenson, Samuel. 1998. “Christian Asceticism and the Emergence of the Monastic Tradition.” In Asceticism, edited by Vincent L. Wimbush, e Richard Valantasis, 49-57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. Schüssler Fiorenza, Elisabeth. 1986. “A Feminist Critical Interpretation for Liberation: Martha and Mary, Lk 10:38-42.” Religion and Intellectual Life 3: 21-36.
  26. Stewart, Columba. 1998. Cassian the Monk. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  27. Wyant, Jennifer, S. 2019. Beyond Mary or Martha: Reclaiming Ancient Models of Discipleship. Atlanta: SBL Press.
  28. Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1981. Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life. Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press.
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2024
  • Pages: 167-175
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2024 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2024
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2024 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Marta e Maria. Prospettive di genere su lavoro e ozio nella tradizione del primo cristianesimo

Authors

Maria Dell'Isola

Language

Italian

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.21

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

Idee di lavoro e di ozio per la nostra civiltà

Editors

Giovanni Mari, Francesco Ammannati, Stefano Brogi, Tiziana Faitini, Arianna Fermani, Francesco Seghezzi, Annalisa Tonarelli

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

1894

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7

ISBN Print

979-12-215-0245-9

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-0319-7

eISBN (epub)

979-12-215-0320-3

Series Title

Studi e saggi

Series ISSN

2704-6478

Series E-ISSN

2704-5919

13

Fulltext
downloads

24

Views

Export Citation

1,308

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

1,962

Book Chapters

3,290,448

Fulltext
downloads

4,155

Authors

from 869 Research Institutions

of 64 Nations

63

scientific boards

from 339 Research Institutions

of 43 Nations

1,150

Referees

from 345 Research Institutions

of 37 Nations