Contained in:
Book Chapter

Media and fake news: An analysis of citizens’ attitudes toward misinformation in European countries

  • Mauro Ferrante
  • Anna Maria Parroco

The rapid changes determined by the rise of Internet and the recent development of social media in daily life have led to profound consequences on the quantity and quality of data made available and on the mechanisms of their dissemination. The rapid spread of on-line disinformation is one of the most discussed topic, and has been identified as one of the top-trends in modern societies by the World Economic Forum, also because of the link between these processes and political communication. Thanks to the availability of micro-data from the Flash Eurobarometer survey on “Fake news and disinformation online”, the present work aims at analyzing the attitude of European citizens toward fake news and disinformation. In a first step, cluster of citizens are identified according to their level of trust in media news, in relation to different types of media. Given the categorical nature of the variables considered, k-mode clustering is implemented. Secondly, the main determinants of news trust levels are analyzed, through regression models for categorical response variables. Preliminary results show that socio-demographic characteristics as well as technological use have an influence on trust in the media, which in turn determines different approaches on the role of institutions in tackling disinformation. The relevance of fake news in contemporary period and its potential consequences on the political side require a reflection on the role of statistical literacy and of official statistical institutes in dealing with disinformation in the post-truth era.

  • Keywords:
  • Disinformation,
  • Eurobarometer,
  • k-mode,
  • Consumer attitude,
  • Trust,
+ Show More

Mauro Ferrante

University of Palermo, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0003-1287-5851

Anna Maria Parroco

University of Palermo, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0003-3213-7805

  1. Allcott, H., & Gentzow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of economic perspectives, 31(2), pp. 211-36.
  2. Baldacci, E. & Pelagalli, F. (2017). Communication of statistics in post-truth society: the good, the bad and the ugly. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union. KS-TC-17-005, 2017.
  3. Borges‐Tiago, T., Tiago, F., Silva, O., Guaita Martinez, J. M., & Botella‐Carrubi, D. (2020). Online users' attitudes toward fake news: Implications for brand management. Psychology & Marketing, 37(9), pp. 1171-1184.
  4. Dinev, T., Goo, J., Hu, Q., & Nam, K. (2009). User behaviour towards protective information technologies: the role of national cultural differences. Information Systems Journal, 19(4), 391-412.
  5. Dentith, M. R. (2016). The problem of fake news. Public Reason, 8(1-2), pp. 65-79.
  6. European Commission (2018) Fake news and disinformation online. Flash Eurobarometer 464. Document available at: https://op.europa.eu/it/publication-detail/-/publication/2d79b85a-4cea-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1/language-en [last accessed 07/2021]
  7. Figueira, Á., & Oliveira, L. (2017). The current state of fake news: challenges and opportunities. Procedia Computer Science, 121, pp. 817-825.
  8. Fletcher, R., Cornia, A., Graves, L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Measuring the reach of “fake news” and online disinformation in Europe. Australasian Policing, 10(2), pp. 25-33.
  9. Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2020). The Crisis of public health and infodemic: Analyzing belief structure of fake news about COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 12(23), 9904, pp.1-23.
  10. Martens, B., Aguiar, L., Gomez-Herrera, E., & Mueller-Langer, F. (2018). The digital transformation of news media and the rise of disinformation and fake news—an economic perspective. JRC Digit. Econ. Work. Pap, 2, 57.
  11. Quan-Haase, A., Williams, C., Kicevski, M., Elueze, I., & Wellman, B. (2018). Dividing the grey divide: Deconstructing myths about older adults’ online activities, skills, and attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(9), pp. 1207-1228.
  12. Reuter, C., Hartwig, K., Kirchner, J., & Schlegel, N. (2019). Fake news perception in Germany: A Representative Study of People's Attitudes and Approaches to Counteract Disinformation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Siegen, Germany.
  13. Rose, J. (2020). To believe or not to believe: An epistemic exploration of fake news, truth, and the limits of knowing. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(1), pp. 202-216.
  14. Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Varol, O., Yang, K. C., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2018). The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature communications, 9(1), pp. 1-9.
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2021
  • Pages: 185-190
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2021 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2021
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2021 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Media and fake news: An analysis of citizens’ attitudes toward misinformation in European countries

Authors

Mauro Ferrante, Anna Maria Parroco

DOI

10.36253/978-88-5518-461-8.35

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2021

Copyright Information

© 2021 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Table of Contents

Book Title

ASA 2021 Statistics and Information Systems for Policy Evaluation

Book Subtitle

BOOK OF SHORT PAPERS of the on-site conference

Editors

Alessandra Petrucci, Bruno Bertaccini, Luigi Fabbris

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2021

Copyright Information

© 2021 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/978-88-5518-461-8

eISBN (pdf)

978-88-5518-461-8

eISBN (xml)

978-88-5518-462-5

Series Title

Proceedings e report

Series Issn ISSN

2704-601X

Series E-Issn

2704-5846

39

Fulltext
downloads

61

Views

Export Citation

1,178

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

815

Book Chapters

1,756,232

Fulltext
downloads

2,574

Authors

from 510 Research Institutions

of 51 Nations

49

scientific boards

from 266 Research Institutions

of 37 Nations

783

Referees

from 186 Research Institutions

of 32 Nations