Contained in:
Book Chapter

Operosi e sabbatici. Lavoro e non-lavoro negli scrittori cristiani antichi

  • Emiliano Rubens Urciuoli

This chapter focuses on a carefully selected body of representations from ancient Christian writers concerning both work and non-work (in the sense of inoperativity). Spanning almost four centuries (i.e, from Paul to Augustine), the chapter consists of two parts. The first brings together statements pertaining to six different strategies of legitimization and valorization of labor (doxic, analogical, apologetic, polemical, soteriological, apocalyptic). The second concentrates on the intrinsic limits and constraints imposed on the emergence of a Christian ideology of inoperativity.

  • Keywords:
  • work,
  • inoperativity,
  • early Christ believers,
+ Show More

Emiliano Rubens Urciuoli

University of Erfurt, Germany - ORCID: 0000-0001-7623-6333

  1. Bauckham, Richard J. 1982. “Sabbath and Sunday in the Post-Apostolic Church.” In From Sabbath to Lord’s Day: A Biblical, Historical, and Theological Investigation, edited by Donald Arthur Carson, 251-98. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.
  2. Benz, Ernst. 1964. “I fondamenti cristiani della tecnica occidentale.” In Tecnica e Casistica. Tecnica, escatologia e casistica, a cura di Enrico Castelli, 241-63. Padova: CEDAM,
  3. Brown, Peter. 1992. Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  4. Brown, Peter. 2016. Treasure in Heaven: The Holy Poor in Early Christianity. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  5. Corsani, Bruno, e Carlo Buzzetti, a cura di. 1996. Nuovo Testamento Greco-Italiano (Versione Conferenza Episcopale Italiana). Roma: Società Biblica Britannica & Forestiera.
  6. Festinger, Leon, Riecken, Henry W., and Stanley Schachter. 1956. When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of a Modern Group that Predicted the Destruction of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.1037/10030-000
  7. Finley, Moses. 1973. The Ancient Economy. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
  8. Finn, Richard OP. 2006. Almsgiving in the Later Roman Empire: Christian Promotion and Practice (313-450). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283606.001.0001
  9. Geoghegan, Arthur T. 1943. The Attitude Towards Labor in Early Christianity and Ancient Culture. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
  10. Godelier, Maurice. 1980. “Work and Its Representations: A Research Proposal.” History Workshop 10: 164-74. DOI: 10.1093/hwj/10.1.164
  11. Gorz, André. 1989 (1988). Critique of Economic Reason. London/New York: Verso.
  12. Grant, Robert M. 1977. Early Christianity and Society. Seven Studies. New York: Harper & Row.
  13. Hemmens, Alastair. 2019. The Critique of Work in Modern French Thought: From Charles Fourier to Guy Debord. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12586-8
  14. Holman, Susan R. 2001. The Hungry Are Dying: Beggars and Bishops in Roman Cappadocia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0195139127.001.0001
  15. Le Goff, Jacques. 1980 (1977). Time, Work, & Culture in the Middle Ages. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  16. MacCornack, Sabine. 2011. “The Virtue of Work: An Augustinian Transformation.” Antiquité tardive IX, 219-37. DOI: 10.1484/j.at.2.300599
  17. Mumford, Lewis. 1967. The Myth of the Machine: Technics and Human Development, vol. I. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  18. Ovitt, George. 1986. “The Cultural Context of Western Technology: Early Christian Attitudes toward Manual Labor.” Technology and Culture 27, 3: 477-500. DOI: 10.2307/3105382
  19. Richardson, Alan. 1953 (1952). Die biblische Lehre von der Arbeit. Zürich: Gotthelf.
  20. Rüpke, Jörg. 2011 (1995). The Roman Calendar from Numa to Constantine: Time, History, and the Fasti. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781444396539
  21. Stowers, 2011. “The Religion of Plant and Animal Offerings Versus the Religion of Meanings, Essences, and Textual Mysteries.” In Ancient Mediterranean Sacrifice, edited by Jennifer Wright Knust, and Zsuzsanna Várhelyi, 35-56. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199738960.003.0001
  22. Thomas, Keith. 1999. The Oxford Book of Work. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
  23. Troeltsch, Ernst. 1932 (1912). The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches. London-New York: George Allen-The Macmillan Company.
  24. White, Lynn. 1963. “What Accelerated Technological Progress in the Western Middle Ages.” In Scientific Change, edited by Alistair Cameron Crombie, 272-91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. White, Lynn. 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis.” Science 155: 1203-207. DOI: 10.1126/science.155.3767.1203
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2024
  • Pages: 177-187
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2024 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2024
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2024 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Operosi e sabbatici. Lavoro e non-lavoro negli scrittori cristiani antichi

Authors

Emiliano Rubens Urciuoli

Language

Italian

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.22

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

Idee di lavoro e di ozio per la nostra civiltà

Editors

Giovanni Mari, Francesco Ammannati, Stefano Brogi, Tiziana Faitini, Arianna Fermani, Francesco Seghezzi, Annalisa Tonarelli

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

1894

Publication Year

2024

Copyright Information

© 2024 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7

ISBN Print

979-12-215-0245-9

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-0319-7

eISBN (epub)

979-12-215-0320-3

Series Title

Studi e saggi

Series ISSN

2704-6478

Series E-ISSN

2704-5919

70

Fulltext
downloads

61

Views

Export Citation

1,343

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

2,222

Book Chapters

3,790,127

Fulltext
downloads

4,410

Authors

from 923 Research Institutions

of 65 Nations

65

scientific boards

from 348 Research Institutions

of 43 Nations

1,248

Referees

from 381 Research Institutions

of 38 Nations