Contained in:
Book Chapter

Profiling students’ satisfaction towards university courses with a latent class approach

  • G. Damiana Costanzo
  • Michelangelo Misuraca
  • Angela Coscarelli

Collecting and analysing students’ opinions towards the learning experiences lived during their enrolment in an academic program is widely recognised as a key strategy to evaluate tertiary education quality. Academic institutions require students to participate every year in specific surveys, aiming at gathering their viewpoint about the organisation of the single courses, and the feelings about the traits and the effectiveness of the teaching activity. In the Italian university system, the surveys about students’ satisfaction are realised in accordance with the guidelines of the National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes. Here we propose the implementation of a latent class analytical strategy to profile the satisfaction of students at a course level, taking into account the interest about each course, and the perceptions about the course organisation and the instructor performance. Since the items listed in the survey are expressed as 4-point balanced scales, we used the so-called Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to identify unobserved clusters of courses (i.e., latent profiles) based on the responses of students to the continuous indicators concerning the different aspect related to course satisfaction. Differently from clustering approaches based on distance functions, LPA is a probabilistic model, which means that it models the probability of case belonging to a profile. An application of the strategy to the first-year courses delivered at the University of Calabria (Italy) in the academic year 2020/2021, during the second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy, is used to show the effectiveness of the approach.

  • Keywords:
  • latent class model,
  • students' satisfaction,
  • educational system evaluation,
+ Show More

G. Damiana Costanzo

University of Calabria, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0003-2295-3278

Michelangelo Misuraca

University of Calabria, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0002-8794-966X

Angela Coscarelli

University of Calabria, Italy

  1. Aboagye, E., Yawson, J.A., Appiah, K.N. (2021). COVID-19 and e-learning: The challenges of students in tertiary institutions. Social Education Research, 2(1), pp. 1–8
  2. Bergman, L.R., Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9(2), pp. 291–319
  3. Biernacki, C., Celeux, G., Govaert, G. (2000). Assessing a mixture model for clustering with the integrated completed likelihood. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(7), pp. 719–725
  4. Chaturvedi, S., Purohit, S., Verma, M. (2021). Effective Teaching Practices for Success During COVID 19 Pandemic: Towards Phygital Learning. Frontiers in Education, 6(646557)
  5. Collins, L.M., Lanza, S.T. (2013). Latent class and Latent Transition Analysis: with applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Wiley, New York, (NY)
  6. ENQA, ESU, EUA, EURASHE (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Brussels, Belgium
  7. van Buuren, S., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of statistical software, 45(3), pp. 1–67
  8. Fosnacht, K., McCormick, A.C., Lerma, R. (2018). First-year students’ time use in college: A latent profile analysis. Research in Higher Education, 59(7), pp. 958–978
  9. Hodis, F.A., Hodis, G.M. (2020). Patterns of motivation and communication in learning environments: a latent profile analysis. Social psychology of Education, 23, pp. 1659–1685
  10. Mai, Y., Wu, Y.J., Huang, Y. (2021). What type of social support is important for student resilience during COVID-19? A Latent Profile Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(646145)
  11. Nylund, K.L., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B.O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 14(4), pp. 535–569
  12. Oberski, D. (2016). Mixture Models: Latent Profile and Latent Class Analysis, in Modern statistical methods for HCI, eds. J. Robertson, M. Kaptein, Springer, Cham, pp. 275–287
  13. Scrucca, L., Fop, M., Murphy, T.B., Raftery, A.E. (2016). mclust 5: clustering, classification and density estimation using Gaussian finite mixture models. The R Journal, 8(1), pp. 205–233
  14. Tein, J.-Y., Coxe, S., Cham, H. (2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 20(4), pp. 640–657
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2023
  • Pages: 17-22
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2023 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2023
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2023 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Profiling students’ satisfaction towards university courses with a latent class approach

Authors

G. Damiana Costanzo, Michelangelo Misuraca, Angela Coscarelli

Language

English

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0106-3.04

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2023

Copyright Information

© 2023 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

ASA 2022 Data-Driven Decision Making

Book Subtitle

Book of short papers

Editors

Enrico di Bella, Luigi Fabbris, Corrado Lagazio

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2023

Copyright Information

© 2023 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press, Genova University Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0106-3

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-0106-3

eISBN (xml)

979-12-215-0107-0

Series Title

Proceedings e report

Series ISSN

2704-601X

Series E-ISSN

2704-5846

138

Fulltext
downloads

180

Views

Export Citation

1,354

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

2,362

Book Chapters

3,870,371

Fulltext
downloads

4,516

Authors

from 936 Research Institutions

of 66 Nations

66

scientific boards

from 351 Research Institutions

of 43 Nations

1,249

Referees

from 381 Research Institutions

of 38 Nations