Contained in:
Book Chapter

Psychometric properties of a new scale for measuring academic positive psychological capital

  • Pasquale Anselmi
  • Daiana Colledani
  • Luigi Fabbris
  • Egidio Robusto
  • Manuela Scioni

Positive psychological capital (PsyCap) is the name given to a set of psychological dimensions (hope, resilience, self-efficacy, and optimism) that may support students in their effort to achieve better academic results and even improve the employability of graduates. These dimensions could help students to achieve better academic results and impact fresh graduates’ ability to stand the labour market in times of crisis. A scale, called Academic PsyCap, was specifically developed to evaluate the four PsyCap dimensions among students and fresh graduates. To deeply investigate the structural validity of the scale, three alternative models (one-factor model, correlated four-factor model, bifactor model) were run on the responses provided by about 1,600 fresh graduates at the University of Padua. The results indicated that the bifactor model fit the data better than the other two models. In this model, all items significantly loaded on both their own domain specific factor and on the general factor. The values of Percentage of Uncontaminated Correlations (PUC), Explained Common Variance (ECV), and Hierarchical Omega suggested that multidimensionality in the scale was not severe enough to disqualify the use of a total PsyCap score. The scale was found to be invariant across gender and academic degree (bachelor’s and master’s degree). Internal consistency indices were satisfactory for the four dimensions and the total scale.

  • Keywords:
  • Academic PsyCap,
  • Fresh graduates,
  • Bifactor model,
  • Measurement invariance,
+ Show More

Pasquale Anselmi

University of Padua, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0003-2982-7178

Daiana Colledani

University of Padua, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0003-2840-9193

Luigi Fabbris

University of Padua, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0001-8657-8361

Egidio Robusto

University of Padua, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0002-7583-2587

Manuela Scioni

University of Padua, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0003-3192-4030

  1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), pp. 716-723.
  2. Anselmi, P., Colledani, D., Fabbris, L, Robusto, E., Scioni, M., (2021). Measuring content validity of academic psychological capital and locus of control in fresh graduates, in ASA 2021 Statistics and Information Systems for Policy Evaluation, Vol. 127, eds. B. Bertaccini, L. Fabbris, and A. Petrucci, Firenze University Press, Firenze, (IT), pp. 23-28.
  3. Baron, R.A., Franklin, R.J., Hmieleski, K.M. (2016). Why entrepreneurs often experience low, not high, levels of stress: The joint effects of selection and psychological capital. Journal of Management, 42(3), pp. 742-768.
  4. Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guilford Press, New York, (NY).
  5. Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., Huyvaert, K.P. (2011). AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: Some background, observations, and comparisons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(1), pp. 23-35.
  6. Cheung, G.W., Rensvold, R.B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), pp. 233-255.
  7. Choisay, F., Fouquereau, E., Coillot, H., Chevalier, S. (2021). Validation of the French Psychological Capital Questionnaire (F-PCQ-24) and its measurement invariance using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework. Military Psychology, 33(1), pp. 50-65.
  8. Dawkins, S., Martin, A., Scott, J., Sanderson, K. (2013). Building on the positives: A psychometric review and critical analysis of the construct of psychological capital. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(3), pp. 348-370.
  9. Flora, D.B., Curran, P.J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, pp. 466-491.
  10. Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J., Avey, J.B., Norman, S.M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), pp. 541-572.
  11. Luthans, K.W., Luthans, B.C., Palmer, N.F. (2016). A positive approach to management education: The relationship between academic PsyCap and student engagement. Journal of Management Development, 35(9), pp. 1-22.
  12. Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesistesting approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), pp. 320-341.
  13. McDonald, R.P. (1999). Test Theory: A Unified Approach. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, (NJ).
  14. Muthén, B.O., Muthén, L.K. (2012). Mplus Version 7: User’s Guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, (CA).
  15. Olatunji, B.O., Ebesutani, C., Tolin, D.F. (2019). A bifactor model of obsessive beliefs: Specificity in the prediction of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 31(2), pp. 210-225.
  16. Reise, S.P., Bonifay, W.E., Haviland, M.G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), pp. 129-140.
  17. Reise, S.P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K.F., Haviland, M.G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, pp. 5-26.
  18. Revelle, W., Zinbarg, R.E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), pp. 145-154.
  19. Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P.É., Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), pp. 354-373.
  20. Robusto, E., Maeran, R., Colledani, D., Anselmi, P., Scioni, M. (2019). Development of two scales for measuring academic psychological capital and locus of control in fresh graduates. Italian Journal of Applied Statistics, 31(1), pp. 13-28.
  21. Rodriguez, A., Reise, S.P., Haviland, M.G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), pp. 137-150.
  22. Seligman, M.E., Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Positive psychology: An introduction, in Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, ed. M. Csikszentmihalyi, Springer, Dordrecht, (NL), pp. 279-298.
  23. Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), pp. 107-120.
  24. Ten Berge, J.M., Sočan, G. (2004). The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 69(4), pp. 613-625.
  25. Youssef, C.M., Luthans, F. (2005). Resiliency development of organizations, leaders and employees: Multi-level theory building for sustained performance, in Authentic Leadership Theory and Practice: Origins, Effects and Development (Monographs in leadership and management, Vol. 3), eds. W. Gardner, B. Avolio, and F. Walumbwa, Elsevier, Oxford, (UK), pp. 303-343.
  26. Zinbarg, R.E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I. (2007). Estimating ω h for structures containing two group factors: Perils and prospects. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31(2), pp. 135-157.
  27. Zinbarg, R.E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), pp. 123-133.
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2021
  • Pages: 25-30
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2021 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2021
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2021 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Psychometric properties of a new scale for measuring academic positive psychological capital

Authors

Pasquale Anselmi, Daiana Colledani, Luigi Fabbris, Egidio Robusto, Manuela Scioni

DOI

10.36253/978-88-5518-461-8.06

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2021

Copyright Information

© 2021 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Table of Contents

Book Title

ASA 2021 Statistics and Information Systems for Policy Evaluation

Book Subtitle

BOOK OF SHORT PAPERS of the on-site conference

Editors

Alessandra Petrucci, Bruno Bertaccini, Luigi Fabbris

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2021

Copyright Information

© 2021 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/978-88-5518-461-8

eISBN (pdf)

978-88-5518-461-8

eISBN (xml)

978-88-5518-462-5

Series Title

Proceedings e report

Series Issn ISSN

2704-601X

Series E-Issn

2704-5846

33

Fulltext
downloads

48

Views

Export Citation

1,175

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

815

Book Chapters

1,712,850

Fulltext
downloads

2,571

Authors

from 510 Research Institutions

of 51 Nations

49

scientific boards

from 259 Research Institutions

of 37 Nations

783

Referees

from 187 Research Institutions

of 32 Nations