Contained in:
Book Chapter

Ripensare la scuola per rigenerare la città: abitare la transizione socio-ecologica

  • Benedetta Masiani

School is rethought as a civic and spatial infrastructure for socio-ecological transition, linking urban regeneration, proximity and collective life. Through place-based practices, it acts as a catalyst for community resilience, redefining the relationship between education, space and inhabiting.

  • Keywords:
  • Socio-ecological transition Urban regeneration Resilient communities Sustainability education Civic infrastructure,
+ Show More

Benedetta Masiani

University of Florence, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0002-3551-017X

  1. Abdullah, H. (2021b). Bridging green and digital agendas in cities to drive more ambitious and inclusive transitions. CIDOB Briefings, 34. Retrieved from https://www.cidob.org/en/content/download/79741/2572720/version/7/file/34_CIDOB%20Briefings_ANG.pdf
  2. Abdullah, H. (Ed.). (2021a). Towards a European Green Deal with cities: The urban dimension of the EU’s sustainable growth strategy. CIDOB.
  3. Abercrombie, P. (1933). Town and country planning. Oxford University Press.
  4. Alberti, F., & Radicchi, A. (2022). La prossimità nei progetti urbani: una analisi comparativa fra Parigi, Barcellona e Milano. TECHNE, 23, 69-77. DOI: 10.36253/techne-12151
  5. Alberti, V., Alonso Raposo, M., Attardo, C., Auteri, D., Ribeiro Barranco, R., Batista, E., Silva, F., Benczur, P., Bertoldi, P., Bono, F., et al. (2019). The future of cities: Opportunities, challenges and the way forward. Publications Office of the European Union.
  6. Allam, Z., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Chabaud, D., & Moreno, C. (2022). The 15-minute city offers a new framework for sustainability, liveability, and health. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(3), e181–e183. DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00014-6
  7. Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J. T., Pearsall, H., Shokry, G., Checker, M., Maantay, J., Gould, K., Lewis, T., Maroko, A., & Roberts, J. T. (2020). Why green “climate gentrification” threatens poor and vulnerable populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(45), 28112–28115. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1920490117
  8. Ayuntamiento de Barcelona. (2019). Plan del juego en el espacio público con horizonte 2030. Retrieved from https://institutinfancia.cat/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/PLAJOC_RESUM_WEB-IIAB_CAST-1.pdf
  9. Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/pdf/report_barca_v230306.pdf
  10. Bentley, G., & Pugalis, L. (2014). Shifting paradigms: People-centred models, active regional development, space-blind policies and place-based approaches. Local Economy, 29(4-5), 283-294. DOI: 10.1177/0269094214541355
  11. Bock, B. B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation: A turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4), 552–573. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12119
  12. Boys, J., & Jeffery, A. (2023). Valuing urban schools as social infrastructure. In B. Cleveland, N. Miles, & P. Chandler (Eds.), Schools as community hubs (pp. 113-130). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-9972-7_5
  13. Brunetto, C. (2019, April 16). La rivolta di Danisinni: Salvate il nostro asilo simbolo di rinascita. Repubblica Palermo.
  14. Bulkeley, H. (2013). Cities and climate change. Routledge.
  15. C40. (2021). Available at: www.c40.org (Accessed October 2023).
  16. Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. Princeton Architectural Press.
  17. Calvaresi, C., & Cognetti, F. (2023). La rigenerazione urbana è apprendimento. In S. Crobe & E. Ostanel (Eds.), Tracce Urbane. Rivista semestrale transdisciplinare di studi urbani - Italian Journal of Urban Studies, 13, 45-66. DOI: 10.13133/2532-6562/18372
  18. Carvalho, A., Ruszczewski, S., & Piscioli, F. (2022). Schools and new learning spaces in Milan: An educational experience. Les Cahiers de la Recherche Architecturale Urbaine et Paysagère, 16. Published online on December 28, 2022. Retrieved from http://journals.openedition.org/craup/11639. DOI: 10.4000/craup.11639
  19. Cellamare, C., & Montillo, F. (2020). Periferie: Abitare a Tor Bella Monaca. Donzelli Editore.
  20. Chau, H., Gilzean, I., Jamei, E., Lesley, P., Preece, T., & Quirke, M. (2022). Comparative analysis of 20-minute neighbourhood policies and practices in Melbourne and Scotland. Urban Planning, 7(4), 13-24. DOI: 10.17645/up.v7i4.5668
  21. Checker, M. (2011). Wiped out by the “greenwave”: Environmental gentrification and the paradoxical politics of urban sustainability. City & Society, 23(2). DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-744x.2011.01063
  22. Chipa, S., Mangione, G. R. J., Greco, S., Orlandini, L., & Rosa, A. (Eds.). (2020). La scuola di prossimità: Dimensioni, geografie e strumenti di un rinnovato scenario educativo. Scholé.
  23. Ciplet, D., Timmons, R., & Khan, M. (2015). Power in a warming: The new global politics of climate change and the remaking of environmental inequality. The MIT Press.
  24. Cleveland, B., Backhouse, S., Chandler, P., Colless, R., McShane, I., Clinton, J., Aston, R., Paproth, H., Polglase, R., Rivera-Yevenes, C., Miles, N., & Lipson-Smith, R. (Eds.). (2023). Schools as community hubs: Building ‘more than a school’ for community benefit. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-9972-7
  25. Coppetti, B., & Manganaro, E. (Eds.). (2023). Inventing schools: Una scuola grande come il mondo. LetteraVentidue.
  26. Coppola, A., Del Fabbro, M., Lanzani, A., Pessina, G., & Zanfi, F. (2021). Ricomporre i divari: Politiche e progetti territoriali contro le disuguaglianze e per la transizione ecologica. Il Mulino.
  27. Cossa, L. (2022). Chi si occupa di città, si occupa di educazione. Retrieved from www.avanzi.org/chi-si-occupa-di-citta-si-occupa-di-educazione (Ultima consultazione ottobre 2023).
  28. Council of the European Union. (2022). Council recommendation on learning for the green transition and sustainable development (2022/C 243/01). Official Journal of the European Union. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022H0627(01)
  29. Crobe, S. (2023). Pratiche di rigenerazione urbana e cultura. Sguardi critici tra co-creazione, istituzionalizzazione e conflitto. In S. Crobe & E. Ostanel (Eds.), Tracce Urbane. Rivista semestrale transdisciplinare di studi urbani - Italian Journal of Urban Studies, 13(Giugno), 6-18.
  30. Crobe, S., & Giubilaro, C. (2022). Street art e rigenerazione urbana? Spazio pubblico e immagini di città oltre le retoriche. In F. Amato, V. Amato, S. De Falco, D. La Foresta, & L. Simonetti (Eds.), Catene/Chains (pp. 877-882). Società di Studi Geografici.
  31. De Coninck, H., Klaus, I., Revi, A., Schultz, S., & Solecki, W. (2018). Summary for urban policymakers: What the IPCC special report on global warming of 1.5°C means for cities. Retrieved from https://iihs.co.in/knowledge-gateway/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Summary-for-Policy-Makers_Online_Citation.pdf (Accessed 9 May 2023).
  32. De Gregorio Hurtado, S. (2021). A Green Deal for the urban age: A new role for cities in EU climate action. In H. Abdullah (Ed.), Towards a European Green Deal with cities: The urban dimension of the EU’s sustainable growth strategy. CIDOB, Barcelona.
  33. Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1). DOI: 10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64
  34. Dessì, V., & Bellomo, A. (2017). Recuperare l’uso degli ambienti esterni. In M. Fianchini (Ed.), Rinnovare le scuole dall’interno. Scenari e strategie per il rinnovamento delle infrastrutture scolastiche (pp. 152-177). Maggioli Editore.
  35. Di Biagi, P. (2003). Quartieri e città nell’Italia degli anni Cinquanta. Il Piano INA Casa 1949-1963. Mélanges de l'École Française de Rome, 115(2), 517.
  36. Dolcetta, B., Manguolo, M., & Marin, A. (2015). Giovanni Astengo urbanista. Piani, progetti, opere. Il Poligrafo.
  37. Dolci, D. (1960). Inchiesta a Palermo. Einaudi.
  38. Elia, G. (2021). La responsabilità della pedagogia nelle trasformazioni dei rapporti sociali. In S. Polenghi, F. Cereda, & P. Zini (Eds.), La responsabilità della pedagogia nelle trasformazioni dei rapporti sociali. Storia, linee di ricerca e prospettive (pp. 19-30). Pensa Multimedia.
  39. Ernsten, C., Gardner, E., & Gogishvili, D. (2009). Micro-rayon living: Everyday life strategies and DIY practices in the post-Soviet micro-rayon. Amsterdam University of Applied Arts.
  40. European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf (Ultimo accesso maggio 2024).
  41. European Commission. (2020a). Draft green recovery plan. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com (Ultimo accesso maggio 2024).
  42. European Commission. (2020b). New Leipzig Charter. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu (Ultimo accesso maggio 2024).
  43. European Commission. (2021a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. New European Bauhaus: Beautiful, sustainable, together. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2021%3A573%3AFIN (Accessed 28 September 2023).
  44. European Commission. (2021b). Local green deals: A blueprint for action. Retrieved from https://www.intelligentcitieschallenge.eu (Ultimo accesso maggio 2024).
  45. European Commission. (2022). Learning for the green transition and sustainable development: Staff working document accompanying the proposal for a Council Recommendation on learning for environmental sustainability. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2766/02392
  46. European Committee of the Regions, Commission for the Environment, Climate Change and Energy, Martinos, H., Tödtling-Schönhofer, H., & Jeffrey, P. (2022). Equal opportunities and responsibilities in the implementation of the European Green Deal. European Committee of the Regions. DOI: 10.2863/718117
  47. European Committee of the Regions. (2021). Green Deal Going Local Roadmap 2021. Retrieved from https://cor.europa.eu (Ultimo accesso maggio 2024).
  48. European Environmental Agency. (2021). Urban sustainability in Europe: Opportunities for challenging times, briefing 03/2021. Retrieved from https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/urban-sustainability-in-europe (Ultimo accesso maggio 2024).
  49. Fondazione Agnelli. (2020). Rapporto sull’edilizia scolastica. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  50. Gabriel, M. (2021). Education for Climate Coalition Speech. Former European Commissioner for Innovation, Research, Culture, Education, and Youth.
  51. Giovanazzi, T. (2022). Rigenerazione scuola. Un piano per orientare l’educazione alla transizione ecologica. Formazione & Insegnamento: European Journal on Education and Teaching, 20(1), 127-135. DOI: 10.7346/-fei-xx-01-22_12
  52. Gisotti, M. R., & Masiani, B. (2023). La scuola fa città. Il ruolo degli spazi aperti scolastici e di quartiere nelle pratiche di educazione alla democrazia. IN_BO. Ricerche e progetti per il territorio, la città e l’architettura, 14(18), 198–217. DOI: 10.6092/issn.2036-1602/14836
  53. Gould, K. A., & Lewis, T. L. (2016). Green gentrification: Urban sustainability and the struggle for environmental justice. Routledge.
  54. Howard, E. (2017). La città giardino del domani. Asterios Editore. (Edizione originale: Garden Cities of Tomorrow, 1902).
  55. INDIRE. (2012). Dalla scuola al civic center. Il modello architettonico e didattico-organizzativo alla base di 4Het Gymnasium. Retrieved from https://www.indire.it/quandolospazioinsegna/scuole/4het-gymnasium/ (Ultimo accesso 10 marzo 2023).
  56. Jacobs, J. (2009). Vita e morte delle grandi città. Einaudi. (Edizione originale: The Death and Life of Great American Cities, 1961, Random House, New York).
  57. Katz, P. (1993). The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. McGraw-Hill Professional.
  58. Lecardane, R. (2022). Diritto d’asilo. Accessibilità e riciclo dell’ex asilo Biondi a Danisinni, Palermo. In CISAV-APS (Eds.), Saperi territorializzati. Abitare le aree fragili tra accessibilità e consapevolezza (pp. 58-61).
  59. Lester, S., & Russell, W. (2008). Play for a change: Play, policy and practice – A review of contemporary perspectives. London: National Children’s Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/415471/Lester_S_and_Russell_W_2008_Play_for_a_change_Play_policy_and_practice_A_review_of_contemporary_perspectives_London_National_Children_s_Bureau (Ultima consultazione 20 giugno 2024).
  60. Malavasi, P. (Ed.). (2019). Un patto educativo per l’ecologia integrale. Il villaggio per la Terra. Pensa Multimedia.
  61. Mansor, H. N., & Alexander, K. (2023). The role of schools play as community hub facilities in contributing to a sustainable community. University of Salford.
  62. Manzini, E. (2021). Abitare la prossimità. Idee per la città dei 15 minuti. EGEA.
  63. Marchigiani, E., & Bonfantini, B. (2022). Urban transition and the return of neighbourhood planning: Questioning the proximity syndrome and the 15-minute city. Sustainability, 14(9), Article 5468. DOI: 10.3390/su14095468
  64. Mattioli, C., Renzoni, C., & Savoldi, P. (2021). Scuole e territori fragili. Il modello lungimirante del Contrat École a Bruxelles. Territorio, 97 (Supplement), 67-76. DOI: 10.3280/TR2021-097-SUPPLEMENTOOA12929
  65. Mecca, S. (Ed.). (2023). Prossimità. Il benessere nella città del futuro. DIDA Press.
  66. Michelucci, G. (1954). La scuola all’aperto e l’urbanistica. Vox, 12.
  67. Miles, S. (2020). Consuming culture-led regeneration: The rise and fall of the democratic urban experience. Space and Polity, 24(1), 1-15.
  68. MIUR. (2013). Norme tecniche-quadro, contenenti gli indici minimi e massimi di funzionalità urbanistica, edilizia, anche con riferimento alle tecnologie in materia di efficienza e risparmio energetico e produzione da fonti energetiche rinnovabili, e didattica indispensabili a garantire indirizzi progettuali di riferimento adeguati e omogenei sul territorio nazionale. Linee guida. Retrieved from https://www.indire.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Linee-guida-2013-converted.pdf
  69. MIUR. (2017). “La scuola al centro” pubblicata la graduatoria finale del bando. Retrieved from https://www.miur.gov.it/-/-la-scuola-al-centro- (Ultimo accesso marzo 2024).
  70. MIUR. (2022). FUTURA. Progettare, costruire, abitare la scuola. Retrieved from https://pnrr.istruzione.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/lineeguida_scuolafutura.pdf (Ultimo accesso marzo 2024).
  71. Mohtat, N., & Khirfan, L. (2021). The climate justice pillars vis-à-vis urban form adaptation to climate change: A review. Urban Climate, 39, 100951. DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100951
  72. Mondino, M. (2023). La rigenerazione urbana a base culturale tra rinascita e retoriche: Il caso Danisinni a Palermo. In S. Crobe & E. Ostanel (Eds.), Tracce Urbane. Rivista semestrale transdisciplinare di studi urbani - Italian Journal of Urban Studies, 13(Giugno), 214-234.
  73. Morena, E., Krause, D., & Stevis, D. (2020). Just transitions: Social justice in a low-carbon world. Pluto Press.
  74. Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the ‘15-minute city’: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities, 4(1), 93-111. DOI: 10.3390/smartcities4010006
  75. Mueller, N., et al. (2020). Changing the urban design of cities for health: The Superblock model. Environment International, 134, 105-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105132
  76. Mumford, L. (1954). The neighborhood and the neighborhood unit. The Town Planning Review, 24(4), 256-270.
  77. New European Bauhaus. (2022). The New European Bauhaus Compass. Retrieved from https://new-european-bauhaus.europa.eu/get-involved/use-compass_en (Accessed 28 September 2023).
  78. Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2021). New urban models for more sustainable, liveable and healthier cities post COVID-19; Reducing air pollution, noise and heat island effects and increasing green space and physical activity. Environment International, 157, 106850. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106850
  79. OECD. (2020a). Back to the future of education: Four OECD scenarios for schooling. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/back-to-the-future-s-of-education-178ef527-en.htm.
  80. OECD. (2020b). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing.
  81. ONU. (1992). Rapporto della Conferenza delle Nazioni Unite sull’ambiente e lo sviluppo. Rio de Janeiro, 3-14 giugno 1992. Retrieved from http://dichiarazione_diriosuambienteesviluppo.pdf.
  82. ONU. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n15/291/89/pdf/n1529189.pdf?openelement.
  83. Osborn, F. J., & Whittick, A. (1977). New towns: Their origins, achievements and progress. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  84. Palestino, M. F., Amore, M. P., Cuntò, S., & Molinaro, W. (2020). Reinventare le scuole come hub di rigenerazione socio-ecologica. Una ricognizione sulle potenzialità degli spazi aperti degli istituti superiori di Napoli. BDC, 20(1), 181–196. DOI: 10.6092/2284-4732/7550
  85. Pasqui, G. (2017). Urbanistica oggi: Piccolo lessico critico. Donzelli Editore.
  86. Pearsall, H., & Anguelovski, I. (2016). Contesting and resisting environmental gentrification: Responses to new paradoxes and challenges for urban environmental justice. Sociological Research Online, 21(3). DOI: 10.5153/sro.3979
  87. Perry, C. (1914). La città al centro del quartiere. La Città Conquistatrice, 18 gennaio 2014.
  88. Perry, C. A. (1998). The neighbourhood unit. Routledge/Thoemmes. (Edizione originale: Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs, 1929, pp. 36–38, 72).
  89. Petrillo, A. (2019). La periferia non è più quella di un tempo. Bordeaux Edizioni.
  90. Picone, M., & Schilleci, F. (2020). La scuola adotta e progetta il quartiere. Un’esperienza di progettazione partecipata a Palermo. In L. Lazzarini & S. Marchionni (Eds.), Spazi e corpi in movimento. Fare urbanistica in cammino. SdT Edizioni.
  91. Polglase, R., McShane, I., & Cleveland, B. (2023). Policy for schools as community hubs: Insights into a fragmented environment. In B. Cleveland, N. Miles, & P. Chandler (Eds.), Schools as community hubs (pp. 269-278). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-9972-7_18
  92. Rabbiosi, C. (2016). Urban regeneration ‘from the bottom up’: Critique or co-optation? Notes from Milan, Italy. City, 20(6), 832-844. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2016.1242240
  93. Renzoni, C., & Savoldi, P. (2019a). Scuole, una questione urbana. Spazi di transizione e di apprendimento. Urbanistica, 163, 140-147.
  94. Renzoni, C., & Savoldi, P. (2019b). Le scuole tra piani, burocrazia e modelli. Il caso milanese. Territorio, 90(1), 54-57.
  95. Rossi Doria, M. (2020). Periferie e fallimento formativo. In G. Laino (Ed.), Quinto rapporto sulle città. Politiche urbane per le periferie (pp. 101-112). Il Mulino.
  96. Savoldi, P. & Rotondo F. (2022). Scuole e politiche urbane: Uno spazio da disegnare. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, 172-196. DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2021-132-S1011
  97. Rueda, S. (1993). Ecología urbana y planificación de la ciudad. Medi Ambient. Tecnología i Cultura, 5.
  98. Save the Children. (2019). Il tempo dei bambini. X Atlante dell’infanzia a rischio. Retrieved from https://s3.savethechildren.it/public/files/uploads/pubblicazioni/x-atlante-dellinfanzia-rischio-il-tempo-dei-bambini_2.pdf (Ultimo accesso: aprile 2024).
  99. Schwarz, R. (1950). Das neue Köln. Cologne: Ein Vorentwurf.
  100. Stein, C. S. (1957). Toward new towns for America. Reinhold. (Trad. it., 1969, Verso nuove città per l'America. Il Saggiatore).
  101. Szkola, S., Denigot, T., Williquet, F., Napoli, V., & European Commission: Joint Research Centre. (2023). Education for Climate Coalition – Annual Report 2022. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2760/06558
  102. Todaro, P. (1988). Il sottosuolo di Palermo. Libreria Dario Flaccovio Editrice.
  103. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707.locale=en.
  104. UNFCCC. (2015). Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement.
  105. UN-Habitat. (2020). World cities report 2020: The value of sustainable urbanization. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Retrieved from: https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/10/wcr_2020_report.pdf (Ultimo accesso maggio 2024).
  106. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.
  107. Velicu, I., & Barca, S. (2020). The just transition and its work of inequality. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16(1), 263-273. DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2020.1814585
  108. Wendler, F. (2022). Framing climate change in the EU and US after the Paris Agreement. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-04059-7_1
  109. Zukin, S. (2008). Consuming authenticity: From outposts of difference to means of exclusion. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 724-748. DOI: 10.1080/09502380802245985
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2026
  • Pages: 133-185
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2026 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2026
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2026 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Ripensare la scuola per rigenerare la città: abitare la transizione socio-ecologica

Authors

Benedetta Masiani

Language

Italian

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0929-8.07

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2026

Copyright Information

© 2026 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

La città fa scuola, la scuola fa città

Book Subtitle

Dallo spazio pubblico ai cortili scolastici per una rinnovata permeabilità

Authors

Benedetta Masiani

Peer Reviewed

Number of Pages

450

Publication Year

2026

Copyright Information

© 2026 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/979-12-215-0929-8

ISBN Print

979-12-215-0928-1

eISBN (pdf)

979-12-215-0929-8

eISBN (xml)

979-12-215-0930-4

Series Title

Premio Tesi di Dottorato Città di Firenze

Series ISSN

3103-3881

Series E-ISSN

3103-3989

0

Fulltext
downloads

0

Views

Export Citation

1,492

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

3,300

Book Chapters

5,736,013

Fulltext
downloads

5,556

Authors

from 1189 Research Institutions

of 66 Nations

77

scientific boards

from 413 Research Institutions

of 46 Nations

1,316

Referees

from 405 Research Institutions

of 39 Nations