1. Arancibia P., Bertolio J., Granata J., Papagni E., Ugolino M. (eds.) 2016, Questioni filologiche: la critica testuale attraverso i secoli, Franco Cesati, Firenze.
2. Balestrini N. 1962, L’almanacco letterario, Bompiani, Milano.
3. Bernard L., O’Keeffe K.O., Unsworth J. (eds.) 2006, Electronic Textual Editing, Modern Language Association, New York.
4. Boralejo B. 2013, Beyond the Document: Transcribing the Text of the Document and the Variant States of the Text, 16-19 July, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
5. Burdick A., Drucker J., Schnapp, J., Lunenfeld D. (eds.) 2012, Digital_Humanities, MIT Press, Boston.
6. Buzzoni M. 2016, A Protocol for Scholarly Digital Editions? The Italian Point of View, in M.J. Driscoll and E. Pierazzo (eds.), «Digital Scholarly Editing», pp. 59-82.
7. Cerquiglini B. 1989, Éloge de la variante. Histoire Critique, Seuil, Paris.
8. Cherchi P. 2016, Filologia, sì, ma non troppa, in P. Arancibia, J. Bertolio, J. Granata, E. Papagni and M. Ugolino (eds.), Questioni filologiche: la critica testuale attraverso i secoli, Franco Cesati, Firenze, pp. 19-40.
9. Cipolla A. 2018, Digital Philology: New Thoughts on Old Questions, Libreria Universitaria, Limena.
10. Clement T. 2016, Where is methodology in Digital Humanities? Debates in the Digital Humanities, ed. by M. Gold and L. Klein, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 153-175.
11. Driscoll M.J., Pierazzo E. (eds.) 2016, Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories and Practices, Open Book Publishers, Cambridge.
12. Fitzpatrick K. 2011, Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy, New York University Press, New York.
13. Flanders J. 2009, The Productive Unease of Twenty-First Century Digital Scholarship, «Digital Humanities Quarterly», III (3), <www.digitalhumanities.org> (09/2019).
14. Fox M. 2016, Robert Palladino, a Master Calligrapher, Is Dead at 83, «New York Times», 6 March, p. A25.
15. Giunta C. 2011, La filologia d’autore non andrebbe incoraggiata, «Ecdotica», 8, pp. 104-18.
16. Giunta C. 2016, Filologia sì, ma con giudizio, «Il Sole 24 ore», 12 June, <https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/cultura/2016-06-10/filologia-si-ma-giudizio-151546.shtml?uuid=ADXTqAT> (09/2019).
17. Gorni G. 1986, La critica del testo: Problemi di metodo ed esperienze di lavoro. Atti del Convegno di Lecce 22-26 ottobre 1984, «Rivista di letteratura italiana», IV (2), pp. 391-412.
18. Hall C., Lollini M., Riva M. (eds.) 2017, Humanist Studies & the Digital Age: Networks and Projects: New Platforms in Digital Humanities, V (1).
19. Jannot M. 2018, From Gene Editing to AI, How Will Technology Transform Humanity? «The New York Times Magazine», 16 November, <https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/16/magazine/tech-design-medicine-phenome.html> (09/2019).
20. Lloret A. (ed.) 2018, Digital Philology: A Journal of Medieval Cultures, VII (1).
21. Liu A. 2013, The Meaning of the Digital Humanities, «PMLA», 128, pp. 409-423.
22. Margalit F. 2016, Robert Palladino, Master Calligrapher, Is Dead at 83, «New York Times», 6 March, p. A25.
23. McGann J. 1983, A Critique of Modern Textual Criticism, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
24. Moretti F. 2007, Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History, Verso, London.
25. Nichols S. (ed.) 1990, The New Philology, special issue of «Speculum: A Journal of Medieval Studies», LXV (1).
26. Nowviskie B. 2014, Digital Humanities 2013: Freedom to Explore, «LLC: The Journal of Digital Scholarship in the Humanities», XXIX (3), 281-82.
27. O’Donnell D.P. 2012, “There’s no Next about it”: Stanley Fish, William Pannapacker, and the Digital Humanities as paradiscipline, dpod blog, 22 June, <http://dpod.kakelbont.ca/2012/06/22/theres-no-next-about-it-stanley-fish-william-pannapacker-and-the-digital-humanities-as-paradiscipline/> (09/2019).
28. Pannapacker W. 2011, Pannapacker at MLA: Digital Humanities Triumphant, «The Chronicle of Higher Education», 8 January, <https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/pannapacker-at-mla-digital-humanities-triumphant/30915> (09/2019).
29. Pierazzo E. 2016, Modelling Digital Scholarly Editing: From Plato to Heraclitus, in M.J. Driscoll and E. Pierazzo (eds.), Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories and Practices, Open Book Publishers, Cambridge, pp. 41-58.
30. Price K., Siemens R. (eds.) 2013, Literary Studies in the Digital Age: An Evolving Anthology, Literature and the Digital Age, Modern Language Association, New York, <https://dlsanthology.mla.hcommons.org/project-history/> (09/2019).
31. Procaccioli P. 2016, Philosophus frequenter, philologus semper distinguit: La grafia tra la difformità della pratica e la tentazione della regola, in P. Arancibia, J. Bertolio, J. Granata, E. Papagni and M. Ugolino (eds.), Questioni filologiche: la critica testuale attraverso i secoli, Franco Cesati, Firenze, pp. 71-96.
32. Ricci R. 2019, The Revolution of the Hand: Scripts and Manuscripts in Poggio Bracciolini’s Florence, «Modern Language Notes», 134 Supplement, pp.  193-214.
33. Risam R. 2018, New Digital Worlds: Postcolonial Digital Humanities in Theory, Praxis, and Pedagogy, Northwestern University Press, Evanston.
34. Riva M. (ed.) 2002, Conclusiones CM publicae disputandae by Pico della Mirandola, <http://cds.library.brown.edu/projects/pico/index.php> (09/2019).
35. Riva M. 2017, Scholarly Networks and Collaborative Practices (Proceedings of the Colloquium held at Brown University on April 16-18, 2015), «Humanist Studies & the Digital Age: Networks and Projects: New Platforms in Digital Humanities», V (1), pp. 5-11.
36. Rockwell G., Day S., Yu J., Engel M. (2014), Burying Dead Projects: Depositing the Globalization Compendium, «Digital Humanities Quarterly», VIII (2), <www.digitalhumanities.org> (09/2019).
37. Rundle D. 2005, The Scribe Thomas Candour and the Making of Poggio Bracciolini’s English Reputation, «English Manuscripts Studies 1100-1700», 12, pp. 1-25.
38. Sahle P. 2016, What is a Scholarly Digital Edition? Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories and Practices, Open Book Publishers, Cambridge.
39. Schreibman S. 2012, Literary Studies in The Digital Age, Modern Language Association, New York.
40. Shillingsburg P. 2006, From Gutenberg to Google: Electronic Representations of Literary Texts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Siemens R., Schreibman S. (eds.) 2004, A Companion to Digital Humanities, Blackwell, Oxford.
42. Siemens R., Schreibman S. (eds.) 2008, A Companion to Digital Literary Studies, Blackwell, Oxford.
43. Terras M. 2016, A Decade in the Digital Humanities, «Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences», 7, pp. 1637-50.
44. Turner J. 2014, Philology: The Forgotten Origins of the Modern Humanities, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
45. Underwood T., Sellers J. 2012, The Emergence of Literary Diction, «Journal of Digital Humanities», I (2), <http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-2/the-emergence-of-literary-diction-by-ted-underwood-and-jordan-sellers/> (09/2019).
46. Varvaro A. 1999, The “New Philology” from the Italian Perspective, trans. by M. Cerchi, «Text», 12, pp. 49-58.
47. Wolf M. 2018, Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
48. Zamponi S. 2004, La scrittura umanistica, «Archiv für Diplomatik, Schriftgeschichte, Sigel- und Wappenkunde», 50, pp. 467-504.

Chapter Information

Bibliographic Information