Contained in:
Book Chapter

Understanding the sensory characteristics of edible insects to promote entomophagy: A projective sensory experience among consumers

  • Alfonso Piscitelli
  • Roberto Fasanelli
  • Elena Cuomo
  • Ida Galli

In recent years, a remarkable number of studies have investigated sensory characteristics, such as flavor and texture, of edible insect and insect-based foods, their contribution to consumers’ attitudes toward edible insects are important in consumer appeal and their willingness to try eating insects in the future. This paper addresses the problem of describing the sensory characteristics aof edible insect and insect-based foods in terms of preferences. To this end, we conducted a study to explore the representations of sensory experiences related to an insect-based dish involving a voluntary sample of 154 consumers. The quasi-experiment, which we have called projective sensory experience (PSE), follows a two-step procedure. In the first step, we asked the participants to imagine tasting an insect-based dish and then to rate, from 1 (imperceptible) up to 10 (very perceptible), the following taste-olfactory sensations: Sapidity, Bitter tendency, Acidity, Sweet, Spiciness, Aroma, Greasiness-Unctuosity, Succulence, Sweet, Fatness, Persistence. In the second step, we asked our interviewees to indicate, through a specific check-list, which was the most disturbing and least disturbing taste-olfactory sensation imagined. We collected data from May to July 2020 by using an anonymous on-line questionnaire. Results could help understand the sensory characteristics of “insects as food” that should be used or avoided, for example, in communication aimed at promoting familiarity with edible insects and improving the acceptability of insects as a novel food.

  • Keywords:
  • Edible insect,
  • Projective sensory experience,
  • Consumers’ preference,
  • Entomophagy,
+ Show More

Alfonso Piscitelli

University of Naples Federico II, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0001-6638-2759

Roberto Fasanelli

University of Naples Federico II, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0001-8908-3284

Elena Cuomo

University of Naples Federico II, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0001-7526-2353

Ida Galli

University of Naples Federico II, Italy - ORCID: 0000-0001-5159-9162

  1. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edition. Wiley, Hoboken, (NJ).
  2. Amato, M., Fasanelli, R. and Riverso, R. (2019). Emotional Profiling for Segmenting Consumers: The Case of Household Food Waste. Calitatea, 20(S2), pp. 27–32.
  3. Bilder, C.R., Loughin, T.M. (2014). Analysis of Categorical Data with R. CRC Press, Boca Raton, (FL).
  4. Donadini, G., Spigno, G., Fumi, M.D., Pastori, R. (2008). Evaluation of Ideal Everyday Italian Food and Beer Pairings with Regular Consumers and Food and Beverage Experts. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 114(4), pp. 329-342.
  5. La Barbera, F., Verneau, F., Videbæk, P.N., Amato, M. and Grunert, K.G. (2020). A self-report measure of attitudes toward the eating of insects: Construction and validation of the Entomophagy Attitude Questionnaire. Food Quality and Preference, 79(103757), pp. 1–9.
  6. La Barbera, F., Verneau, F., Amato, M. and Grunert, K. (2018). Understanding Westerners’ disgust for the eating of insects: The role of food neophobia and implicit associations. Food Quality and Preference, 64, pp. 120–125.
  7. Lammers, P., Ullmann, L.M., and Fiebelkorn, F. (2019). Acceptance of insects as food in Germany: Is it about sensation seeking, sustainability consciousness, or food disgust?. Food Quality and Preference, 77, pp. 78–88.
  8. Mancini, S., Moruzzo, R., Riccioli, F., and Paci, G. (2019). European consumers' readiness to adopt insects as food. A review. Food Research International, 122, pp. 661–678.
  9. Materia, V.C. and Cavallo, C. (2015). Insetti per l’alimentazione umana: Barriere e drivers per l’accettazione da parte dei consumatori. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 70(2), pp. 139–161.
  10. R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, (AT). Available at: http:/www.R-project.org (accessed 15 June 2021).
  11. Schrögel, P. and Wätjen, W. (2019). Insects for Food and Feed-Safety Aspects Related to Mycotoxins and Metals. Foods, 8(8), pp. 288–315.
  12. Sogari, G. and Vantomme, P. (2014). A Tavola con Gli Insetti. Mattioli 1885, Fidenza, (IT).
  13. Sogari, G., Menozzi, D., and Mora, C. (2017). Exploring young foodies ׳†knowledge and attitude regarding entomophagy: A qualitative study in Italy. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 7, pp. 16–19.
  14. Verneau, F., La Barbera, F., Kolle, S., Amato, M., Del Giudice, T., Grunert, K. (2016). The effect of communication and implicit associations on consuming insects: An experiment in Denmark and Italy. Appetite, 106, pp. 30–36.
PDF
  • Publication Year: 2021
  • Pages: 223-227
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2021 Author(s)

XML
  • Publication Year: 2021
  • Content License: CC BY 4.0
  • © 2021 Author(s)

Chapter Information

Chapter Title

Understanding the sensory characteristics of edible insects to promote entomophagy: A projective sensory experience among consumers

Authors

Alfonso Piscitelli, Roberto Fasanelli, Elena Cuomo, Ida Galli

Language

English

DOI

10.36253/978-88-5518-461-8.42

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2021

Copyright Information

© 2021 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Bibliographic Information

Book Title

ASA 2021 Statistics and Information Systems for Policy Evaluation

Book Subtitle

BOOK OF SHORT PAPERS of the on-site conference

Editors

Bruno Bertaccini, Luigi Fabbris, Alessandra Petrucci

Peer Reviewed

Publication Year

2021

Copyright Information

© 2021 Author(s)

Content License

CC BY 4.0

Metadata License

CC0 1.0

Publisher Name

Firenze University Press

DOI

10.36253/978-88-5518-461-8

eISBN (pdf)

978-88-5518-461-8

eISBN (xml)

978-88-5518-462-5

Series Title

Proceedings e report

Series ISSN

2704-601X

Series E-ISSN

2704-5846

328

Fulltext
downloads

307

Views

Export Citation

1,361

Open Access Books

in the Catalogue

2,368

Book Chapters

3,870,371

Fulltext
downloads

4,536

Authors

from 942 Research Institutions

of 66 Nations

67

scientific boards

from 357 Research Institutions

of 43 Nations

1,249

Referees

from 381 Research Institutions

of 38 Nations